Barrous et al v. BP P.L.C. et al

Filing 87

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting, AS MODIFIED, 75 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 65 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 84 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment As To Punitive Damages. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2011)

Download PDF
Allen Ruby, Esq. SB #47109 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 Steven A. Ellenberg, Esq., SB # 151489 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN A. ELLENBERG 4 North Second Street, Suite 1240 San Jose, California 95 113 Telephone: (408) 998-8500 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Maria Barrous, an individual and as Trustee of the Barrous Living Trust, Demetrios Barrous, an individual, dba Jimmy's Restaurant Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C 10-02944 LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER IN GRANTINGOF SUPPORT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Oil, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc., BP Corporation North America, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and DOES 120 Defendants. LOCAL RULE 6-3 Date: Time: Place: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucv H. Koh GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE ALL OF THEIR OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS PARTIAL SUMMARY 11 JUDGMENT MOTIONS ON AUGUST 1,2011, WITH ALL OF DEFENDANTS REPLIES BEING FILED ON AUGUST 18 25,201 1. The hearing remains as set on September 1, 2011, at 1:30 pm. August 3, 2011 Lucy District Court Judge U.S. H. Koh United States District Judge ucy H. Ko h RT FO NO J u d ge L R NIA D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO LI UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S Dated: 7 A H RN I/ MOTION TO EXTEND TlME TOEFILEDOPPOSITIONS C OF IS T RIC T 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?