San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Aero Products International, Inc et al

Filing 295

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SEVER KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION re 248 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/27/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CAROL LYNN THOMPSON (SBN 148079) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 TELEPHONE: [phone] FACSIMILE: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION

KATHRYN G. SPELMAN (SBN 154512) DANIEL H. FINGERMAN (SBN 229683) MOUNT & STOELKER RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650 333 West San Carlos Street San Jose, CA 95110-2740 TELEPHONE: [phone] FACSIMILE: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) Case No. 10-CV-02994 JF HRL ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) -----------------AERO PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER BP LUBRICANTS USA INC., BRH BRANDS, ) TO SEVER ) INC., CALICO BRANDS, INC., COOPER ) LIGHTING, LLC, DAREX LLC, DEXAS ) INTERNATIONAL LTD., DYNA-GRO ) NUTRITION SOLUTIONS, FISKARS BRANDS, INC., GLOBAL CONCEPTS, INC., ) ) HOMAX PRODUCTS, INC., KIMBERLY) CLARK CORPORATION, KRACO ENTERPRISES LLC, LIXIT CORPORATION, ) ) MEAD WESTVACO CORPORATION, NUTRITION 21 INC., OATEY CO., ) OPTIMUM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC., SCHICK ) MANUFACTURING, INC., THE SCOTTS ) COMPANY LLC, STERLING ) INTERNATIONAL, INC., VITAMIN POWER ) INCORORATED, WOODSTREAM ) CORPORATION, 4-D DESIGN, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SEVER: Case No. 10-cv-02994 JF HRL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff San Francisco Technology, Inc. and Defendant Kimberly Clark Corporation ("Kimberly Clark"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that defendant Kimberly Clark shall be severed from the case. This stipulation is made in light of the Court's ruling in San Francisco Technologies, Inc. v. Glad Products, Co., 2010 Lexis 83681 (N.D. Cal. 2010), where the Court determined that severance was appropriate in similar circumstances. Subject to the Court's approval, the parties request that the clerk open a new case number in San Francisco Technologies v. Kimberly Clark Corporation. IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. Dated: September 17, 2010 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Carol Lynn Thompson Carol Lynn Thompson Attorneys for Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation Dated: September 17, 2010 MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C.

By: /s/ Dan Fingerman Dan Fingerman Attorneys for Plaintiff San Francisco Technology, Inc.

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the below signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory above. Dated: September 17, 2010 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Carol Lynn Thompson Carol Lynn Thompson Attorneys for Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SEVER: CASE NO. 10-CV-02994 JF HRL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED.

9/27/10 Dated: __________________

By:___________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SEVER: CASE NO. 10-CV-02994 JF HRL