San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Aero Products International, Inc et al

Filing 380

ORDER GRANTING 289 DEFENDANT SCHICK MANUFACTURING, INC.'S MOTION TO TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/16/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2010)

San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Aero Products International, Inc et al

Doc. 380

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Talley E. McIntyre (SBN 203131) [e-mail] NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3600 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Maia H. Harris (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] NIXON PEABODY LLP 100 Summer Street, 25th Floor Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant SCHICK MANUFACTURING INC.

**E-Filed 11/16/2010**

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC., Plaintiff, vs. AERO PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL INC.; BP LUBRICANTS USA INC.; BRK BRANDS INC.; CALICO BRANDS INC.; COOPER LIGHTING LLC; DAREX LLC; DEXAS INTERNATIONAL LTD.; DYNA-GRO NUTRITION SOLUTIONS; FISKARS BRANDS INC.; GLOBAL CONCEPTS INC.; HOMAX PRODUCTS INC.; KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION; KRACO ENTERPRISES LLC; LIXIT CORPORATION; MEAD WESTVACO CORPORATION; NUTRITION 21 INC.; OATEY CO.; OPTIMUM TECHNOLOGIES INC.; NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.; SCHICK MANUFACTURING INC.; THE SCOTTS COMPANY LLC; STERLING INTERNATIONAL INC.; VITAMIN POWER INCORPORATED; WOODSTREAM CORPORATION; 4-D DESIGN INC, Defendants. [PROPOSED] ------------------- ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SCHICK MANUFACTURING, INC.'S MOTION TO TRANSFER No. CV10-02994-JF

Date: Time: Place: Judge:

submitted without oral argument November -----2010------------- 19, -----9:00 a.m. Courtroom 3, 5th Floor Hon. Jeremy D. Fogel

Complaint Filed:

July 8, 2010

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SCHICK MANUFACTURING, INC.'S MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO. 10 CV10-02994 - JF 13225139.2

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Having considered Defendant Schick Manufacturing, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer the Motion, Plaintiff's Statement of Non-Opposition thereto, the Reply Brief, the pleadings on file in the present action, and on proof being made to the satisfaction of the Court:

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Schick Manufacturing, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court, District of Connecticut (Bridgeport), Schick's request that the case, including all currently pending motions, and case management and/or scheduling issues (including Schick's pending Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and 12 (b)(1) (Dkt. # 236)) be transferred to United States District Court, District of Connecticut (Bridgeport)-----------------------prior to the hearing -------------matter-for---------------19-t-- and Schick's request that all deadlines, hearings, discovery, set in this ------- --- November -- h, disclosures, case management and/or scheduling issues be stayed until transfer is complete are GRANTED. 11/16/2010 Dated: ___________________

By: ____________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel United States District Court Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SCHICK MANUFACTURING, INC.'S MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO. 10 CV10-02994 - JF 13225139.2

-2-