San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Aero Products International, Inc et al

Filing 455

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on August 4, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2011)

**E-Filed 8/4/2011**

1 RALPH A. ZAPPALA (SBN 102052)
Email: [e-mail]
2 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
One Sansome Street, Suite 1400
3
San Francisco, California 94104
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
(Pro Hac Vice)
6 NICHOLAS B. CLIFFORD, JR.
Email: [e-mail]
7
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
8 7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1800
St. Louis, Missouri 63105
9 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
10
Attorneys for Defendant MeadWestvaco
11
Corporation
12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19

San Francisco Technology, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
vs.

20

Aero Products International, Inc., et
21 al.,
22
23

Defendants.

Case No. 5:10-cv-02994-JF
------------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION
TO STAY DISCOVERY OR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO DISCOVERY
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:

August 5, 2011
9:00 am
Hon. Judge Jeremy Fogel
Courtroom 3, 5th Floor

24
25
26
27
28
5:10-cv-02994-JF
-------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY OR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY

1

The parties stipulate and request that the Court enter an order as follows:

2

1.

3
4

The parties have reached a settlement which would result in the dismissal of this

case and avoid the need for motion practice. The parties request a continuance of the motion
hearing to allow time for a formal agreement to be executed.

5
2.

6
7

Defendant MeadWestvaco Corporation filed a motion to Stay Discovery or

Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery (Docket No. 443) on June 8, 2011 which remains

8 pending. The Court is currently scheduled to hear that motion on Friday, August 5, 2011 at 9:00
9 a.m.
10
11

3.

The parties request that the Court continue the motion hearing to allow time for the

parties to execute a formal written agreement and dismiss this case. The parties request that the

12
Court continue the motion to its next available hearing date, but in no event before Friday,
13
14

September 30, 2011.
In accordance with General Order 45.X.B, Ralph A. Zappala, counsel for Defendant

15

16 MeadWestvaco Corporation attests that each other signatory listed below has concurred in this
17 filing.
18
19

Respectfully submitted,
DATED: August 3, 2011

MOUNT, SPELMAN & FINGERMAN, P.C.

20
21

By: /S/
Benjamin R. Lemke
Attorney for Plaintiff San Francisco Technology, Inc.

22
23
24 DATED: August 3, 2011

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

25
26

By: /S/
Ralph A. Zappala
Attorney for Defendant MeadWestvaco Corporation

27
28

4811-1899-8282.1

1

5:10-cv-02994-JF
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY OR
-------------EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY

1
DATED: August 3, 2011

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

2
3
By: /S/
Nicholas B. Clifford, Jr.
Attorney for Defendant MeadWestvaco Corporation

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED:

7
8
9

August 4, 2011
Dated: __________________________

________________________________________
Hon. Jeremy Fogel, U.S. District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4811-1899-8282.1

2

5:10-cv-02994-JF
-------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY OR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY