Von Haar v. City of Mountain View et al
Filing
55
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 50 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
JODY LYNN VON HAAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, TONY
VIERYA, aka JOSE VIEYRA, TY ZEMLOK,
FERNANDO MALDONADO, Does 1-100,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-02995-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
On September 7, 2011, Plaintiff, with her previous attorney William B. Look, Jr., filed an
18
amended notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. In light of Mr. Look’s subsequent
19
temporary suspension from the practice of law, and this Court’s finding that Mr. Look was in
20
contempt of Court, this Court, in an abundance of caution, gave Plaintiff, who is now pro se,
21
additional opportunities to prosecute her case.
22
On October 27, 2011, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss with
23
Prejudice for Lack of Prosecution, see Dkt. #50, and the Court’s most recent Order to Show Cause
24
Why the Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute, see Dkt. #44. Plaintiff did not
25
file a response to either Defendants’ Motion or the Court’s Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff
26
likewise failed to appear at the October 27, 2011 hearing. The Court hereby DISMISSES this
27
action with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
Case No.: 10-CV-02995-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
1
Dated: October 27, 2011
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 10-CV-02995-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?