Von Haar v. City of Mountain View et al

Filing 55

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 50 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 JODY LYNN VON HAAR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, TONY VIERYA, aka JOSE VIEYRA, TY ZEMLOK, FERNANDO MALDONADO, Does 1-100, 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-02995-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE On September 7, 2011, Plaintiff, with her previous attorney William B. Look, Jr., filed an 18 amended notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. In light of Mr. Look’s subsequent 19 temporary suspension from the practice of law, and this Court’s finding that Mr. Look was in 20 contempt of Court, this Court, in an abundance of caution, gave Plaintiff, who is now pro se, 21 additional opportunities to prosecute her case. 22 On October 27, 2011, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss with 23 Prejudice for Lack of Prosecution, see Dkt. #50, and the Court’s most recent Order to Show Cause 24 Why the Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute, see Dkt. #44. Plaintiff did not 25 file a response to either Defendants’ Motion or the Court’s Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff 26 likewise failed to appear at the October 27, 2011 hearing. The Court hereby DISMISSES this 27 action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Case No.: 10-CV-02995-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 1 Dated: October 27, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 10-CV-02995-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?