West v. Quality Gold, Inc.

Filing 96

ORDER DENYING 93 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Trent West AS MOOT and STRIKING Plaintiff's late-filed Opposition to JII's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/10/12. (ejdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03124-EJD TRENT WEST, 11 ORDER STRIKING TRENT WEST’S OPPOSITION TO JII’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff / Counter-defendant, v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 QUALITY GOLD, INC., 13 Defendant / Counter-claimant 14 Re: Docket Item No. 93 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 15 / 16 Third-party Defendant Jewelry Innovations, Inc. (“JII”) filed and served a motion for 17 summary judgment on December 9, 2011. ECF Nos. 83–85. On December 27, 2011, Plaintiff Trent 18 West made a request to file under seal an opposition to JII’s motion. West’s opposition was late, see 19 Civil L.R. 7-3(a), and was not accompanied by a request to extend time or any reason explaining the 20 tardiness. The opposition is therefore STRICKEN, and West’s motion to file that opposition under 21 seal is TERMINATED AS MOOT. If West wishes to file an opposition to JII’s motion outside the 22 time period afforded by the local rules, it must make an administrative motion pursuant to Civil L.R. 23 6-3. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: January 10, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03124-EJD ORDER STRIKING WEST’S OPPOSITION TO JII’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?