Navarro -v- Arrow Electronics

Filing 17

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Upon review, the parties have provided insufficient information as to why they are unprepared for trial and in need of additional discovery, frustrating the Court's attempt to schedule this matt er. Because of the parties' unreadiness, the Court finds that a Pretrial Conference would be premature at this time. Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the March 7, 2011 Pretrial Conference to April 4, 2011 at 10 a.m. On or before March 25, 2011, the parties shall file either a Stipulated Request for Continuance of Discovery and Motion Deadlines, or a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement that provides the Court with a proposed schedule as to how this case should proceed. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/2/2011.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)

Navarro -v- Arrow Electronics

Doc. 17

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kathy Navarro, Plaintiff, v.
For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 10-03210 JW ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

United States District Court

11 12

Arrow Electronics, Inc., 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / This case is scheduled for a Pretrial Conference on March 7, 2011. Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of this Court, the parties conferred and duly submitted a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement. (See Docket Item No. 16.) In their Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement, the parties state that they are "not presently prepared for trial." (Id. at 2.) Further, the parties state that they both need additional discovery, and that they anticipate filing a stipulated request for continuance of discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. (Id.) Upon review, the parties have provided insufficient information as to why they are unprepared for trial and in need of additional discovery, frustrating the Court's attempt to schedule this matter. Because of the parties' unreadiness, the Court finds that a Pretrial Conference would be premature at this time.

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the Pretrial Conference to April 4, 2011 at 10 a.m. On or before March 25, 2011, the parties shall file either a Stipulated Request for Continuance of Discovery and Motion Deadlines, or a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement that provides the Court with a proposed schedule as to how this case should proceed.

Dated: March 2, 2011 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

1 2 3 4

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Aaron Arnold Roblan [e-mail] Gerald A. Emanuel [e-mail]

Dated: March 2, 2011 5 6 7 8 9 10

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28