Gens v. Vello Corporation et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 Extending Time For Defendants to File Their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion For Remand. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 9/3/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 9/3/2010)

Download PDF
Gens v. Vello Corporation et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JAMES L. JACOBS (SBN 158277) KATHRYN C. CURRY (SBN 157099) GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP 1891 Landings Drive Mountain View, CA 94043 Telephone: (650) 428-3900 Facsimile: (650) 428-3901 Email: jjacobs@gcalaw.co m kcurry@gcalaw.co m Attorneys for Defendants, CALLVINE, INC. and EDWARD R. PRINCE erroneously sued herein as RUDY PRINCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION M o u n t a i n View, Ca l i f o r n i a 11 12 TIMOTHY GENS, 13 Plaint iff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Timothy Gens has noticed his Motion for Remand to be heard on September 28, 2010 before this Court; WHEREAS, a dispute exists between Plaintiff Timothy Gens, on the one hand, and Defendants Callvine, Inc. and Edward R. Prince, on the other hand, regarding whether or not Plaintiff's Motion For Remand and supporting papers were timely filed and served to permit a September 28, 2010 hearing date under the Local Rules of this Court; WHEREAS, in order to avoid the filing by Defendants of a motion for administrative -1STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REMAND Dockets.Justia.com CASE NO. 5:10-cv-03220-PVT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND Date: Dept . : Time: September 28, 2010 5, 4th Floor 10:00 a.m. VELLO CORPORATION; CALLVINE, INC. and RUDY PRINCE, Defendants. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP relief pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 seeking to continue the hearing date so that Defendants have more time to prepare and file their opposition to the Motion For Remand, Plaintiff has proposed modifying the briefing schedule to provide Defendants with additional time to prepare and file their opposition papers; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN TIMOTHY GENS AND DEFENDANTS' ATTORNEYS' OF RECORD AS FOLLOWS: 1. If Plaintiff's Motion for Remand remains on the Court's calendar for hearing on September 28, 2010, then Defendants Callvine, Inc. and Edward R. Prince shall have up to and including September 10, 2010 to file their opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. By agreeing to this stipulation, Defendants are not waiving any objections whatsoever (whether procedural or substantive) that they may have to the Motion for Remand. 2. 3. Plaintiff's reply brief shall be filed no later than September 14, 2010. The requested time modification will not affect any other dates presently 10 M o u n t a i n View, Ca l i f o r n i a 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 scheduled for this case, and neither party has previously sought any modification to the briefing schedule on Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. DATED: September 2, 2010 By: ___/s/ Timothy H. Gens _____________ Plaintiff, Timothy H. Gens In Pro Per DATED: September 2, 2010 GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP By: ___/s/ James L. Jacobs_____________ James L. Jacobs Kathryn C. Curry Attorneys for Defendant CALLVINE, INC. and EDWARD R. PRINCE // // // -2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REMAND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants Callvine, Inc. and Edward R. Prince shall have up to and including September 10, 2010 to file their opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. Plaintiff's reply brief shall be filed no later than September 14, 2010. Date: ___9/3/10___ __________________________________ Magistrate Patricia V. Trumbull 10 M o u n t a i n View, Ca l i f o r n i a 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REMAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?