Locsin et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 6

(Proposed) Order Relating Case by Jennifer Locsin. (Terrell, Reginald) (Filed on 8/26/2010) Modified on 8/26/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DONALD AMAMGBO, ESQ. AMAMGBO & ASSOCIATES 7901 Oakport Street, Suite 4900 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 615-6000 Facsimile: (510) 615-6025 Email: Donald@amamgbolaw.com REGINALD TERRELL, ESQ. THE TERRELL LAW GROUP Post Office Box 13315, PMB #148 Oakland, California 94661 Telephone: (510) 237-9700 Facsimile: (510) 237-4616 Email: Reggiet2@aol.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re: Google Inc. Street View Electronic Communications Litigation, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) This Document Relates to: ) ) JENNIFER LOCSIN and JAMES ) BLACKWELL, individually and on behalf of ) all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al. Defendant. CASE NO.: 5:10-md-02184-JW-PVT MDL NO.: 2184 [PROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES CASE NO. 5:10-MD-03272 - PVT ORDER RELATING CASES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jennifer Locsin and James Blackwell, the Plaintiffs in Locsin v. Google, Inc., No. 10-cv03272-PVT, filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12. The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, HEREBYGRANTS the motion. IT IS ORDERED that Locsin v. Google, Inc., No. 10-cv-03272-PVT, is hereby related to In Re: Google Inc. Street View Electronic Communications Litigation, No. 5:10-md-02184JW. Locsin v. Google, Inc., No. 10-cv-03272-PVT, shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge pursuant to Local Rule 3-12(f)(3). Dated: __________________________________ THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER RELATING CASES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?