Bellomo v. Xenoport, Inc. et al

Filing 46

STIPULATION AND ORDER 45 Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/23/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 COOLEY LLP JOHN C. DWYER (136533) dwyerjc@cooley.com JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934) jsantamaria@cooley.com ADAM TRIGG (261498) atrigg@cooley.com Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 *E-FILED - 6/23/11* 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants XENOPORT, INC., RONALD W. BARRETT, WILLIAM J. RIEFLIN, DAVID A. STAMLER, MARK A. GALLOP and DAVID R. SAVELLO 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 Case No. 10-CV-3301 RMW IN RE XENOPORT, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 948618 v1/HN 1. STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2010, plaintiff Ie-Chen Cheng (“Plaintiff”) filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in this action; 3 WHEREAS, plaintiff and all defendants agree that due to the schedules of the parties and 4 their attorneys, defendants’ time to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC, and any subsequent 5 briefing schedule, should be extended. 6 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, by and between 7 plaintiff and defendants that the time by which defendants must answer or otherwise respond to 8 the FAC shall be extended to July 29, 2011; 9 10 If defendants respond to the FAC by filing a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, lead plaintiff shall have until August 29, 2011 to file an opposition to the motion; 11 12 13 14 Defendants shall have until September 14, 2011 to file a reply in support of the motion; and The hearing on the motion shall take place on Friday, September 23, 2011 or as soon thereafter as the Court is available. 15 16 17 18 Dated: June 17, 2011 19 I, Adam Trigg, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Samuel Rosen has concurred in this filing. 20 21 22 23 COOLEY LLP /s/ Adam Trigg (261498) Attorneys for Defendants XENOPORT, INC., RONALD W. BARRETT, WILLIAM J. RIEFLIN, DAVID A. STAMLER, MARK A. GALLOP and DAVID R. SAVELLO 24 HARWOOD FEFFER LLP 25 /s/ Samuel K. Rosen Co-Lead Class Counsel 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 948618 v1/HN 2. STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 3 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 6/23/11 DATED: _______________________ THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 948618 v1/HN 3. STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?