Bellomo v. Xenoport, Inc. et al
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER 45 Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/23/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
COOLEY LLP
JOHN C. DWYER (136533) dwyerjc@cooley.com
JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934)
jsantamaria@cooley.com
ADAM TRIGG (261498) atrigg@cooley.com
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone: (650) 843-5000
Facsimile: (650) 849-7400
*E-FILED - 6/23/11*
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants
XENOPORT, INC., RONALD W. BARRETT, WILLIAM J.
RIEFLIN, DAVID A. STAMLER, MARK A. GALLOP and
DAVID R. SAVELLO
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
Case No. 10-CV-3301 RMW
IN RE XENOPORT, INC. SECURITIES
LITIGATION
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
948618 v1/HN
1.
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2010, plaintiff Ie-Chen Cheng (“Plaintiff”) filed the First
Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in this action;
3
WHEREAS, plaintiff and all defendants agree that due to the schedules of the parties and
4
their attorneys, defendants’ time to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC, and any subsequent
5
briefing schedule, should be extended.
6
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, by and between
7
plaintiff and defendants that the time by which defendants must answer or otherwise respond to
8
the FAC shall be extended to July 29, 2011;
9
10
If defendants respond to the FAC by filing a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, lead
plaintiff shall have until August 29, 2011 to file an opposition to the motion;
11
12
13
14
Defendants shall have until September 14, 2011 to file a reply in support of the motion;
and
The hearing on the motion shall take place on Friday, September 23, 2011 or as soon
thereafter as the Court is available.
15
16
17
18
Dated: June 17, 2011
19
I, Adam Trigg, am the ECF User whose ID
and password are being used to file this
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Extending Time to Respond to First
Amended Complaint. In compliance with
General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that
Samuel Rosen has concurred in this filing.
20
21
22
23
COOLEY LLP
/s/
Adam Trigg (261498)
Attorneys for Defendants
XENOPORT, INC., RONALD W. BARRETT,
WILLIAM J. RIEFLIN, DAVID A. STAMLER,
MARK A. GALLOP and DAVID R. SAVELLO
24
HARWOOD FEFFER LLP
25
/s/
Samuel K. Rosen
Co-Lead Class Counsel
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
948618 v1/HN
2.
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
3
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6/23/11
DATED: _______________________
THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
948618 v1/HN
3.
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?