Ruiz et al v. Cabrera et al

Filing 5

ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL 3 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO REMAND. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2010)

Download PDF
Ruiz et al v. Cabrera et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 **E-Filed 8/23/2010** VALENTIN RUIZ, JOSE RUIZ, Plaintiffs, v. Case Number C 10-3358 JF (HRL) ORDER1 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO REMAND [re: docket no. 3] JULIO CABRERA, BEATRIZ A. MONTOYA CABRERA, PHILLIP J. DAUNT, ATTORNEY, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. On August 3, 2010, Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd filed a Report and Recommendation that this Court summarily remand the instant action to the Monterey Superior Court. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed Judge Lloyd's recommendation as well as the record in this case in conformity with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Civil Local Rule 72-3. The Court concurs with and adopts in its entirety the Report and Recommendation of Judge Lloyd. The action is hereby remanded. The Clerk shall transmit the file to the Monterey Superior Court. This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. C a s e Number C 10-3358 JF (HRL) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO REMAND ( JF L C 1 ) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 8/23/2010 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 C a s e Number C 10-3358 JF (HRL) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO REMAND ( JF L C 1 ) 1 Copies of Order served on: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 C a s e Number C 10-3358 JF (HRL) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO REMAND ( JF L C 1 ) Valentin and Jose Ruiz 656 San Juan Grade Road Salinas, CA 93906

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?