Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
101
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 96 Motion to Change Schedule, as Modified.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FABIO E. MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
fmarino@orrick.com
BAS DE BLANK (STATE BAR NO. 191487)
bdeblank@orrick.com
DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
dmingrone@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVEN HWANG, an individual,
Defendants.
Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RE CASE
SCHEDULE , AS MODIFIED
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RE CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428-LHK
1
The Court, having read and considered all papers filed in support of and in opposition to
2
Plaintiffs Brocade Communications, Inc. and Foundry Networks, LLC motion for administrative
3
relief re case schedule, all pleadings and papers on file in this action, the applicable law, and the
4
arguments of counsel made at any hearing on the motion, hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion and
5
supplements the existing case schedule as follows with respect to Defendant A10 Networks,
6
Inc.’s allegation of infringement of U.S. Patent 5,875,185. The Court will construe no moreclaim
only 10 than
7
Filing Due
Deadline
A10 Patent L.R. 3-1, 3-2 disclosures
June 24, 2011
LR 3-3 and 3-4 Invalidity Contentions
July 25, 2011
8
9
10
LR 4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms
August 1, 2011
11
LR 4-2 Preliminary Claim Constructions
August 15, 2011
12
CMC
August 24, 2011
13
LR 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing
Statement
August 26, 2011
14
LR 4-4 Completion of Claim Construction Discovery
September 26, 2011
15
LR 4-5 Opening Claim Construction Briefs/SJ Motions
re: claim construction
October 11, 2011
Responsive briefs/SJ Opp
November 8, 2011
Replies
November 22, 2011
18
Technology Tutorial Submissions
December 5, 2011
19
Tutorial Hearing
December 12, 2011
20
Claim Construction/SJ Hearings
December 19, 2011
21
CMC
February 15, 2012
Private Mediation Final date
April 2, 2012
CMC
May 2, 2012
Pre-trial Conference
June 20, 2012
Trial
July 16, 2012
16
17
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
July 1
Dated: _____________, 2011
________________________________
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
27
United States District Court Judge
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428-LHK
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
