Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 1026

REVISED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT, re 1024 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 6/10/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

13
14

ALLEN J. RUBY (SBN 47109)
[e-mail]
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1100
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone:
650-470-4500
Facsimile:
650-470-4570
FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650-815-7400
Facsimile:
6508-15-7401
DENISE MINGRONE (SBN 135224)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-740
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN JOSE DIVISION

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
v.

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-03428 PSG
REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVE HWANG, an individual,
Defendant and Counterclaimants.

27
28
REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG

1

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

2

1.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Brocade Communications

3

Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) and Foundry Networks, LLC (“Foundry”) against Defendant A10

4

Networks, Inc. (“A10 Networks”), for the amount of $75,000,000.00 (seventy-five million U.S.

5

dollars).

6

2.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Individual Defendants Lee Chen,

7

Rajkumar Jalan, Ronald Szeto, Steve Hwang, Liang Han (collectively, “Individual Defendants”)

8

on all claims by Brocade and Foundry against the Individual Defendants.

9

3.

Brocade and Foundry will forebear from execution of this Stipulated Final

and Annex A thereto. Upon fulfillment by A10 of all financial, dismissal and withdrawal terms

12
MENLO PAR K

Judgment so long as A10 is not in breach of the Binding Term Sheet executed on May 20, 2013

11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

(including at least paragraphs 1-5) of the Binding Term Sheet and Annex A thereto, Brocade and

13

Foundry shall file an Acknowledgement Re Satisfaction of Judgment and [Proposed] Order in the

14

form attached as Exhibit A hereto, and the permanent injunctions entered on January 10, 2013

15

and January 23, 2013 (as modified by the Court’s order of February 12, 2013) shall be dissolved

16

at such time.

17

4

This Stipulated Final Judgment is enforceable and non-appealable. This Stipulated

18

Final Judgment represents a final judgment regarding all claims, counterclaims, and defenses that

19

were or could have been raised in this action by Brocade, Foundry and/or A10.

20

5.

This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Stipulated Final Judgment in

21

accordance with the terms of, and to enforce the terms of, the parties' Binding Term Sheet dated

22

May 20, 2013.

23

6

Each Party to bear its own fees and costs.

24
25
26
27
28
-2-

REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG

1

Dated: June 7, 2013

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

2
/s/ Fabio E. Marino
FABIO E. MARINO
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

3
4
5
6

Dated: June 7, 2013

7

/s/ Annette L. Hurst
ANNETTE L. HURST
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

8
9
Dated: June 7, 2013

11
12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
/s/ Scott R. Mosko
SCOTT R. MOSKO
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR
JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVE HWANG

13
14
15

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Dated: June 7, 2013

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

16
/s/ Mark A. Flagel
MARK A. FLAGEL
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
A10 NETWORKS, INC.,

17
18
19
20

Dated: June 7, 2013

21

LOSCH & EHRLICH
/s/ Joseph Ehrlich
JOSEPH EHRLICH
Attorneys for Defendant
LIANG HAN

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: June 10, 2013

26
27

Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

28
-3-

REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG

Exhibit A

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

13
14

ALLEN J. RUBY (SBN 47109)
[e-mail]
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1100
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone:
650-470-4500
Facsimile:
650-470-4570
FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650-815-7400
Facsimile:
6508-15-7401
DENISE MINGRONE (SBN 135224)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-740
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN JOSE DIVISION

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVE HWANG, an individual,
Defendant and Counterclaimants.

Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 PSG
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT FILED
CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH

27
28
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG

1

Plaintiffs Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and Foundry Networks, LLC

2

(collectively “Plaintiffs”), located at 130 Holger Way, San Jose, CA 95134, hereby acknowledge

3

the satisfaction of the Revised Stipulated Final Judgment entered by the Court on June ___, 2013

4

(Dkt. ___), by defendant A10 Networks, Inc. (“A10”), located at 3 West Plumeria Drive, San

5

Jose, CA 95134.

6
7

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that the Court enter the [Proposed] Order regarding
Satisfaction of Judgment filed concurrently herewith.

8
9

11
12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

13
14

ALLEN J. RUBY (SBN 47109)
[e-mail]
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1100
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone:
650-470-4500
Facsimile:
650-470-4570
FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650-815-7400
Facsimile:
6508-15-7401
DENISE MINGRONE (SBN 135224)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-740
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN JOSE DIVISION

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
v.

Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 PSG
REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVE HWANG, an individual,
Defendant and Counterclaimants.

28
REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

Plaintiffs Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) and Foundry

3

Networks, LLC (“Foundry”) have acknowledged that A10 Networks, Inc. (“A10”) has fully

4

satisfied the terms of the Stipulated Final Judgment entered by the Court on June ___, 2013 (Dkt.

5

___).

6

2.

Accordingly, the clerk of this Court shall enter this Satisfaction of Judgment.

7

3.

The patent permanent injunction entered on January 10, 2013 (Dkt. 830) and the

8

trade secret permanent injunction entered on January 23, 2013 (Dkt. 848) (as modified by the

9

Court’s order of February 12, 2013) are hereby DISSOLVED and of no further force or effect.

11
12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG