Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 180

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 150 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

FABIO ELIA MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
[e-mail]
DENISE M. MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
[e-mail]
SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008)
[e-mail]
CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467)
[e-mail]
NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
15
16
17

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,

18
19
20
21
22
23

v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVEN HWANG, an individual,
Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY
AND SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATIONS OF ROBERT
YOUNG AND MANI KANCHERLA IN
SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION ,AS MODIFIED

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMIN. MTN
FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL REPLY AND SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATIONS - CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

1

The Court, having considered Brocade Communications, Inc. and Foundry Networks

2

LLC’s (“Plaintiffs”) administrative motion for leave to file under seal their Reply in Support of

3

Their Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (“Reply”); Plaintiffs’

4

Evidentiary Objections To The Declaration Of David Klausner In Support Of A10 Networks,

5

Inc’s Opposition To Motion For Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction

6

(“Evidentiary Objections”); Supplemental Declaration of Robert Young In Support of Plaintiffs’

7

Reply (“Young Supplemental Declaration”); and Supplemental Declaration of Mani Kancherla In

8

Support of Plaintiffs’ Reply (“Kancherla Supplemental Declaration”) and having found good

9

cause to do so, it is HEREBY ORDERED that said leave is GRANTED in its entirety.

10

The Plaintiffs may file under seal Plaintiffs’ Reply, Evidentiary Objections, the Young

11

Supplemental Declaration, and the Kancherla Supplemental Declaration.

12

Plaintiffs shall comply with G.O. 62 in electronically filing the sealed information.

13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15
16
17

August 15
Dated: _____________, 2011
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMIN. MTN
FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL REPLY AND SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATIONS - CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK