Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 180

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 150 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FABIO ELIA MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825) fmarino@orrick.com DENISE M. MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224) dmingrone@orrick.com SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008) svenkatesan@orrick.com CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467) cvonderahe@orrick.com NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906) ngambhir@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 17 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and STEVEN HWANG, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS OF ROBERT YOUNG AND MANI KANCHERLA IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ,AS MODIFIED 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMIN. MTN FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL REPLY AND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS - CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK 1 The Court, having considered Brocade Communications, Inc. and Foundry Networks 2 LLC’s (“Plaintiffs”) administrative motion for leave to file under seal their Reply in Support of 3 Their Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (“Reply”); Plaintiffs’ 4 Evidentiary Objections To The Declaration Of David Klausner In Support Of A10 Networks, 5 Inc’s Opposition To Motion For Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction 6 (“Evidentiary Objections”); Supplemental Declaration of Robert Young In Support of Plaintiffs’ 7 Reply (“Young Supplemental Declaration”); and Supplemental Declaration of Mani Kancherla In 8 Support of Plaintiffs’ Reply (“Kancherla Supplemental Declaration”) and having found good 9 cause to do so, it is HEREBY ORDERED that said leave is GRANTED in its entirety. 10 The Plaintiffs may file under seal Plaintiffs’ Reply, Evidentiary Objections, the Young 11 Supplemental Declaration, and the Kancherla Supplemental Declaration. 12 Plaintiffs shall comply with G.O. 62 in electronically filing the sealed information. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 August 15 Dated: _____________, 2011 Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMIN. MTN FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL REPLY AND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS - CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?