Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
260
ORDER Regarding Discovery Motions. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 10/21/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation, LEE CHEN, an individual,
RAJKUMAR JALAN, an individual, RON
SZETO, an individual, LIANG HAN, an
individual, STEVEN HWANG, an individual,
and DAVID CHEUNG, an individual,
Defendants.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY
MOTIONS
20
21
On October 17, 2011 Brocade filed a motion to compel A10 to substantially complete its
22
document production and answer Plaintiffs’ interrogatories. ECF No. 247. A10 shall file its
23
response to the motion no later than October 24, 2011.1 The response shall be no more than 3
24
pages in length. The Court will not accept reply briefs. The hearing date for all pending discovery
25
motions (see ECF Nos. 237 and 247) will be set for November 22, 2011 to follow the case
26
1
27
28
On October 12, 2011, Brocade filed a motion to compel responses to interrogatory requests. ECF
No. 237. On October 19, 2011, Brocade filed a response to A10’s motion to compel which
included a motion to strike A10’s motion to compel. ECF No. 257. The motion to strike appears
to be the same as Brocade’s response to A10’s motion to compel. As such, the briefing regarding
A10’s motion to compel interrogatory responses is considered closed.
1
Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS
1
management conference. The Court may resolve the pending discovery motions in advance of the
2
hearing date.
3
In the future, all discovery motions noticed before this Court in this action shall be limited
to three pages in length. Oppositions to any discovery motion shall be filed one week after the
5
opening motion is filed and shall be limited to three pages in length. The Court will not accept
6
reply briefs. Prior to filing a discovery motion the moving party shall contact the Courtroom
7
Deputy Martha Parker Brown to obtain a hearing date. The Court may resolve discovery motions
8
in advance of the hearing date.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
4
Dated: October 21, 2011
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?