Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 286

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending the Due Date for Defendants' Claim Construction Brief. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/3/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2011) Modified text on 11/3/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Scott R. Mosko (State Bar No. 106070)
[e-mail]
Scott A. Herbst (State Bar No. 226739)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Stanford Research Park
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff
A10 NETWORKS, INC. and Defendants LEE CHEN,
RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, and STEVE HWANG

9

(Additional counsel listed on signature page.)

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation; and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

15
Plaintiffs,

16
v.
17
18
19

A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN,
RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, LIANG HAN,
STEVE HWANG, and DAVID CHEUNG,

Case No. 5:10-cv-03428-LHK

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING THE DUE
DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
Judge:

Honorable Lucy H. Koh

Defendants.

20
21
22

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation,
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26

v.
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation; and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

27
Counterclaim-Defendants.
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DATE FOR CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
Case No. 5:10-cv-03428-LHK

1
2

STIPULATION
Defendants A10 Networks, Inc., Lee Chen, Rajkumar Jalan, and Ron Szeto (“Defendants”),

3

and Plaintiffs Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., and Foundry Networks, LLC, hereby

4

stipulate that Defendants’ Responsive Claim Construction brief, currently due on November 8, 2011,

5

shall now be filed on or before November 15, 2011. The parties jointly stipulate and request this

6

change because Plaintiffs’ declarant, Dr. Bestavros, has only limited availability for his requested

7

deposition.

8
9

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other
signatories pursuant to General Order 45(X)(B).

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

11

DATED: October 28, 2011

12

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Scott R. Mosko
By: ____________________________________
Scott R. Mosko
Attorneys for Defendants
A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN,
RAJKUMAR JALAN, and RON SZETO

Bas de Blank
By: ____________________________________
Bas de Blank
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

13
14
15
16
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER

18
19

Upon good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Responsive Claim

20

Construction Brief shall now be filed on or before November 15, 2011.

21

DATED: November 3, 2011

22
23
24

Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DATE FOR CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
Case No. 5:10-cv-03428-LHK