Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 352

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 254 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

FABIO MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
[e-mail]
DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
[e-mail]
SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008)
[e-mail]
CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467)
[e-mail]
NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVEN HWANG, an individual,
Defendants/Counterclaimants.

Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC.’S AND FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF
OPPOSITION AND MOTION TO
STRIKE A10 NETWORKS INC.’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
Judge:

Hon. Lucy H. Koh

24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN.
MTN FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO.10-CV-03428 LHK

1

The Court, having considered Brocade Communications, Inc.’s and Foundry Networks

2

LLC’s (“Plaintiffs”) Administrative Motion for Leave to file under seal their Exhibits attached to

3

the Declaration of Denise E. Mingrone In Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition and Motion to Strike

4

A10 Networks Inc.’s Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses, and having found good cause to

5

do so, it is HEREBY ORDERED that said leave is GRANTED in its entirety.

6
7

The Plaintiffs may file under seal the following documents:
1.

Exhibits C, D, E, G, and H, attached to the Declaration of Denise E.

8

Mingrone In Support of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and

9

Foundry Networks, LLC’s Opposition and Motion to Strike A10

10

Networks Inc.’s Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses.

11

Specifically, these Exhibits are:

12

a.

13
14

Secrets
b.

15
16

c.

d.

Ex. G: 2011.04.08 [Brocade] Supplemental Responses to A10’s
First Set of Interrogatories

e.

21
22

Ex. E: 2011.09.16 [Brocade] Second Supplemental
Identification of Trade Secrets

19
20

Ex. D: 2011.06.27 [Brocade] Plaintiffs’ Supplemental
Identification of 20 Categories of Trade Secrets

17
18

Ex. C: 2011.05.31 [Brocade] Plaintiffs’ Identification of Trade

Ex. H: 2011.09.16 [Brocade] Supplemental Responses to A10’s
First and Second Set of Interrogatories

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

November 29
Dated: _____________, 2011
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge

26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN.
MTN FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO.10-CV-03428 LHK