Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 357

ORDER Adopting Amended Protective Order. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/29/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)

1

(Counsel of record listed on next page)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,

Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO
MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVEN HWANG, an individual,
Defendants and Counterclaimants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

OHSWEST:261408601.2

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

FABIO MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
[e-mail]
DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
[e-mail]
SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008)
[e-mail]
CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467)
[e-mail]
NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC
WILLIAM E. IRELAND (STATE BAR NO. 115600)
[e-mail]
H. ANN LIROFF (STATE BAR NO. 113180)
[e-mail]
HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP
71 Stevenson Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415-546-7500
Facsimile:
415-546-7505
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID CHEUNG

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

SCOTT R. MOSKO (STATE BAR NO. 106070)
[e-mail]
SCOTT A. HERBST (STATE BAR NO. 226739)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
Stanford Research Park
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone:
650-849-6600
Facsimile:
650-849-6666
SMITH R. BRITTINGHAM IV (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JOHN F. HORNICK (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone:
202-408-4000
Facsimile:
202-408-4400

28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

OHSWEST:261408601.2

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

LIONEL M. LAVENUE (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JOHN M. MULCAHY
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive
Reston, VA 20190
Telephone:
571-203-2700
Facsimile:
202-408-4400
Attorneys for Defendants
A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR JALAN,
RON SZETO, and STEVE HWANG

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

JOSEPH ERLICH (STATE BAR NO. 84359)
[e-mail]
LOSCH & EHRLICH
425 California Street, Ste. 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
LIANG HAN

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

OHSWEST:261408601.2

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiffs Brocade Communications

2

Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) and Foundry Networks, LLC (“Foundry”) and Defendants A10

3

Networks, Inc., Lee Chen, Rajkumar Jalan, Ron Szeto, David Cheung, and Liang Han

4

(collectively, “the parties”):

5
6
7

(1)

To expedite discovery, the source code previously deposited at Iron Mountain by

the parties shall be transferred to the offices of the Parties’ Counsel until this case is resolved.
(2)

The source code shall be maintained at the parties’ counsel’s offices only on

8

secured computers in a secured room without Internet access or network access to other

9

computers, and the Receiving Party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any portion of

10
11

the source code onto any recordable media or recordable device.
(3)

The Receiving Party shall maintain a record of any individual who has inspected

12

any portion of the source code in electronic or paper form. The Receiving Party shall maintain all

13

paper copies of any printed portions of the source code in a secured, locked area. The Receiving

14

Party shall not create any electronic or other images of the paper copies and shall not convert any

15

of the information contained in the paper copies into any electronic format. The Receiving Party

16

shall only make additional paper copies if such additional copies are (1) necessary to prepare

17

court filings, pleadings, or other papers (including a testifying expert’s expert report), (2)

18

necessary for deposition, or (3) otherwise necessary for the preparation of its case. Any paper

19

copies used during a deposition shall be retrieved by the Producing Party at the end of each day

20

and must not be given to or left with a court reporter or any other individual. Any paper copies of

21

source code shall be immediately marked “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”

22

pursuant to Paragraph 2.10 of the Protective Order (D.I. 94).

23

(4)

Upon request of the deposing party, a computer with the source code of the party

24

being deposed will be made available during deposition with a connected printer to allow for any

25

additional source coded needed during the deposition to be printed out. Any source code that is

26

printed out in this manner that the Receiving Party wishes to keep after the deposition shall be

27

subject to the provisions of Paragraph (3) above.

28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

OHSWEST:261408601.2

-1-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

2
3

Dated: November 29, 2011

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

4
5

/s/ Fabio E. Marino
FABIO E. MARINO
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

6
7
8
9

Dated: November 29, 2011

HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP

10
/s/ Ann H. Liroff
ANN H. LIROFF
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID CHEUNG

11
12
13
14

Dated: November 29, 2011

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER LLP

15
16

/s/ Scott R. Mosko
SCOTT R. MOSKO
Attorneys for Defendants
A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR
JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVE HWANG

17
18
19
20

Dated: November 29, 2011

LOSCH & EHRLICH

21
/s/ Joseph Ehrlich
JOSEPH EHRLICH
Attorneys for Defendant
LIANG HAN

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

OHSWEST:261408601.2

-2-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

1
2
3

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.
Dated: November 29, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

4
5

/s/ Fabio E. Marino
FABIO E. MARINO

6
7
8

ORDER

9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated:

November 29, 2011
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

OHSWEST:261408601.2

-3-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK