Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 401

Order Modifying Protective Order. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/14/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)

1

(Counsel of record listed on next page)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,

Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO
MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVE HWANG, an individual,
Defendants and Counterclaimants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY
PROTECTIVE ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

FABIO MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
[e-mail]
DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
[e-mail]
SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008)
[e-mail]
CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467)
[e-mail]
NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC
WILLIAM E. IRELAND (STATE BAR NO. 115600)
[e-mail]
H. ANN LIROFF (STATE BAR NO. 113180)
[e-mail]
HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP
71 Stevenson Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-546-7505
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID CHEUNG
SCOTT R. MOSKO (STATE BAR NO. 106070)
[e-mail]
SCOTT A. HERBST (STATE BAR NO. 226739)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
Stanford Research Park
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-849-6666
SMITH R. BRITTINGHAM IV (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JOHN F. HORNICK (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
202-408-4400

28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY
PROTECTIVE ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

LIONEL M. LAVENUE (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JOHN M. MULCAHY
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive
Reston, VA 20190
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
202-408-4400
Attorneys for Defendants
A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR JALAN,
RON SZETO, and STEVE HWANG
JOSEPH ERLICH (STATE BAR NO. 84359)
[e-mail]
LOSCH & EHRLICH
425 California Street, Ste. 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
LIANG HAN

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY
PROTECTIVE ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiffs Brocade Communications
Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) and Foundry Networks, LLC (“Foundry”) and Defendants A10
Networks, Inc. (“A10”), Lee Chen, Rajkumar Jalan, Ron Szeto, David Cheung, Liang Han, and
Steve Hwang (collectively, “the parties”):
To facilitate discovery in A10 Networks, Inc. v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.,
Case No. 4:11-cv-05493-LHK (N.D. Cal.) (the “A10 Action”), the Protective Order in the abovecaptioned action (which shall be referred to as the “Brocade Action”) shall be entered in the A10
Action and therefore apply to disclosure and discovery activity in both the Brocade Action and
A10 Action.
The parties further stipulate the Protective Order in each of the Brocade and A10 Action
will be modified in the following respects:
1.

forth in Sections 2.12, 2.15 and 2.16 of each Protective Order shall be modified to

14

encompass Outside Counsel, Experts and Professional Vendors retained for either

15
16
17

the A10 Action or Brocade Action.
2.

Brocade or A10 Action in connection with either dispute between Brocade and

19

A10, and are permitted to consult with other authorized Outside Counsel, Experts,

20

and Professional Vendors retained for either action with respect to such Protected

21

23
24

Outside Counsel, Experts, and Professional Vendors in either the Brocade or A10
Action may have access to Protected Material produced by any party in either the

18

22

The definition of “Outside Counsel,” “Expert,” and “Professional Vendors” set

Material.
3.

All Outside Counsel, Experts and Professional Vendors will be subject to the
provisions of the Protective Order in all other respects.

25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY
PROTECTIVE ORDER

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

3
4

Dated: December 13, 2011

5
6

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
/s/ Scott R. Mosko
SCOTT R. MOSKO
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
A10 NETWORKS, INC., and Defendants LEE CHEN,
RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVE
HWANG

7
8
9
10
11

Dated: December 13, 2011

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

12
/s/ Fabio E. Marino
FABIO E. MARINO
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

13
14
15
16
17

Dated: December 13, 2011

18

/s/ Ann H. Liroff
ANN H. LIROFF
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID CHEUNG

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP

Dated: December 13, 2011

LOSCH & EHRLICH
/s/ Joseph Ehrlich
JOSEPH EHRLICH
Attorneys for Defendant
LIANG HAN

26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY
PROTECTIVE ORDER

1
2
3
4

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.
Dated: December 13, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

5
/s/ Scott R. Mosko
Scott R. Mosko

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 14, 2011

THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO MODIFY
PROTECTIVE ORDER