Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 442

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 419 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document433-1 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Scott R. Mosko (State Bar No. 106070)
[e-mail]
Scott A. Herbst (State Bar No. 226739)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Stanford Research Park
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
A10 NETWORKS, INC. and Defendants LEE CHEN,
RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, and STEVE HWANG

9

(Additional counsel listed on signature page.)

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation; and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

15
Plaintiffs,

16
v.
17
18
19

A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN,
RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, LIANG HAN,
STEVE HWANG, and DAVID CHEUNG,
Defendants.

20
21
22

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation,

25
26

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(D)
GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’
EXPERT’S DECLARATION AND
ASSOCIATED EXHIBITS IN
SUPPORT OF CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION AND SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OPPOSITIONS
Judge:

Honorable Lucy H. Koh

Counterclaimant,

23
24

Case No. 5:10-cv-03428-LHK

v.
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation; and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

27
Counterclaim Defendants.
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOT FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Case No. 5:10-cv-03428-LHK

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document433-1 Filed01/06/12 Page2 of 2

1

The Court, having considered Brocade Communications, Inc.’s and Foundry Networks

2

LLC’s (“Plaintiffs”) administrative motion for leave to file the following documents under seal, and

3

having good cause to do so, it is HEREBY ORDERED that said leave is GRANTED.

4

Plaintiffs may file under seal Exhibits J and K to the Declaration of Nitin Gambhir in Support

5

of Plaintiffs’ (1) Claim Construction Brief; (2) Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary

6

Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,647.427 and 7,716,370; and (3) Opposition to

7

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,558,195 in

8

their entirety.

9

Plaintiffs may file under seal Paragraph Numbers 68-86 and 94-119 of the Declaration of

10

Izhak Rubin in Support of Plaintiffs’ (1) Claim Construction; (2) Opposition to Defendants’ Motion

11

for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos, 7,647.427 and 7,716,370; and (3)

12

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No.

13

7,558,195. Paragraph Numbers 1-67 and 87-93 of the Declaration shall not be filed under seal.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 18, 2012

16
17
18

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOT FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Case No. 5:10-cv-03428-LHK