Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
449
ORDER re: Case Management. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/27/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, )
)
v.
)
)
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
)
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
)
RAJKUMAR JALAN, an individual; RON
)
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an )
individual; LIANG HANG, an individual; and )
STEVE HWANG, an individual,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants.
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
15
On December 20, 2011, the Court ordered Brocade to narrow its case to five copyrights by
16
January 31, 2012. The parties are scheduled to meet with the Court on February 1, 2012. To give
17
the parties sufficient time to resolve any issues before meeting with the Court, the Court proposes
18
continuing the February 1, 2012 meeting to February 8, 2012, at 2 p.m. The Court also proposes
19
that by 5 p.m. on Monday, February 6, 2012, each party file an up to three page statement
20
regarding any additional issues to be discussed with the Court other than the forensic examination
21
issues. If the Court can resolve the forensic examination issues based on the parties’ filings prior to
22
the Court’s meeting with the parties, the Court will do so. By 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 27,
23
2012, the parties shall file a statement accepting the Court’s proposal or proposing an alternative.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: January 27, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
27
28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?