Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 449

ORDER re: Case Management. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/27/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, ) ) v. ) ) A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California ) corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; ) RAJKUMAR JALAN, an individual; RON ) SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an ) individual; LIANG HANG, an individual; and ) STEVE HWANG, an individual, ) ) Defendants and Counterclaimants. ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 15 On December 20, 2011, the Court ordered Brocade to narrow its case to five copyrights by 16 January 31, 2012. The parties are scheduled to meet with the Court on February 1, 2012. To give 17 the parties sufficient time to resolve any issues before meeting with the Court, the Court proposes 18 continuing the February 1, 2012 meeting to February 8, 2012, at 2 p.m. The Court also proposes 19 that by 5 p.m. on Monday, February 6, 2012, each party file an up to three page statement 20 regarding any additional issues to be discussed with the Court other than the forensic examination 21 issues. If the Court can resolve the forensic examination issues based on the parties’ filings prior to 22 the Court’s meeting with the parties, the Court will do so. By 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 27, 23 2012, the parties shall file a statement accepting the Court’s proposal or proposing an alternative. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: January 27, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 1 Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?