Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 479

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 472 Stipulation re Deposition of Bobby Johnson.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document472 Filed02/21/12 Page1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

FABIO MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
[e-mail]
DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
[e-mail]
SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008)
[e-mail]
CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467)
[e-mail]
NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY
NETWORKS, LLC

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER
REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF
BOBBY JOHNSON
Judge:

Hon. Lucy H. Koh

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVEN HWANG, an individual,
Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE
DEPOSITION OF BOBBY JOHNSON
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document472 Filed02/21/12 Page2 of 5

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and Foundry Networks,

2

LLC (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants A10 Networks, Inc., Lee Chen, Rajkumar Jalan, Ron Szeto,

3

and Steve Hwang (“the A10 Defendants”) have jointly requested entry of this [Proposed]

4

Stipulated Order regarding the Deposition of Bobby Johnson;

5
6

WHEREAS, the parties were prepared to take the deposition of Mr. Johnson prior to
the close of discovery on March 2, 2012;

7
8

WHEREAS, Mr. Johnson requested a postponement of his deposition to March 12 or
March 14, 2012; and

9

WHEREAS, Mr. Johnson is a third party to this action, and to the extent it would not

10

affect the progress of this case toward trial, the parties are willing to accommodate his request

11

to postpone his deposition until March 12 or March 14, 2012 in order to minimize the burden

12

on Mr. Johnson, and

13
14

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs request an extension of the Protective Order to include any
confidential information disclosed by Mr. Johnson during his deposition,

15

Having reviewed and approved the terms of this [Proposed] Stipulated Order,

16

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows:

17

1. The deposition of Mr. Johnson may be postponed until either March 12 or March

18

14, 2012; and

19

2. The Protective Order in this matter shall apply to any and all confidential

20

information disclosed by Mr. Johnson for purposes of his deposition.

21

///

22

///

23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

-1-

STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE
DEPOSITION OF BOBBY JOHNSON
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document472 Filed02/21/12 Page3 of 5

1

Dated: February 21, 2012

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

2
3

/s/ Fabio E. Marino
FABIO E. MARINO
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

4
5
6
7
8

Dated: February 21, 2012

9

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER LLP

10
11

SCOTT R. MOSKO
Attorneys for Defendants
A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR
JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVE HWANG

12
13
14
15

Dated: February 21, 2012

HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP

16
17

___/s/ Ann Liroff___________________________
ANN LIROFF
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID CHEUNG

18
19
20
21

Dated: February 21, 2012

LOSCH & EHRLICH

22
23
24
25

_/s/ Joseph Ehrlich________________________
JOSEPH EHRLICH
Attorneys for Defendant
LIANG HAN

26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

-2-

STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE
DEPOSITION OF BOBBY JOHNSON
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document472 Filed02/21/12 Page4 of 5

1
2

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.

3
4

Dated: February 21, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

5
__/s/ Fabio Marino____________________
FABIO E. MARINO

6
7
8
9

ORDER

10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13
14

Dated: February 22, 2012

_______________________________
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY

-3-

STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE
DEPOSITION OF BOBBY JOHNSON
CASE NO. 10-CV-03428 LHK

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document472 Filed02/21/12 Page5 of 5