Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 523

ORDER re Dismissal of Defendant David Cheung. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/8/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, ) ) v. ) ) A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California ) corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; ) RAJKUMAR JALAN, an individual; RON ) SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an ) individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and ) STEVE HWANG, an individual, ) ) Defendants and Counterclaimants. ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT DAVID CHEUNG On May 7, 2012, Brocade filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of 18 Civil Procedure, to dismiss without prejudice all claims against Defendant David Cheung in the 19 above-captioned action. ECF No. 520. By May 10, 2012, all parties who have appeared in the 20 above-captioned action shall file either: (1) a stipulation of dismissal of all claims against Mr. 21 Cheung, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by all parties who have 22 appeared; or (2) a joint statement identifying which parties intend to oppose Brocade’s motion to 23 dismiss and a brief statement of the reasons for such opposition. The Court will set a hearing date 24 for Brocade’s motion to dismiss only if a party intends to oppose Brocade’s motion. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: May 8, 2012 28 1 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge Case No.: 10-CV-03428-LHK ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT DAVID CHEUNG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?