Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 607

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 600 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document600 Filed06/21/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3

ALLEN J. RUBY (STATE BAR NO. 47109)
[e-mail]
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1100
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: 650-470-4570

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

FABIO E. MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
[e-mail]
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: 650-815-7401
DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: 650-614-7401

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
v.

Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE SUBMISSION OF JURY
INSTRUCTIONS
Judge:

Hon. Lucy H. Koh

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual;
RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON
SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an
individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and
STEVEN HWANG, an individual,
Defendants and Counterclaimants.

25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S ILICON VALLEY

OHSUSA:750920387.2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SUBMISSION OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 LHK

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document600 Filed06/21/12 Page2 of 3

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiffs Brocade Communications

2

Systems, Inc. and Foundry Networks, LLC (together, “Brocade”) and Defendant A10 Networks,

3

Inc., Lee Chen, Rajkumar Jalan, Liang Han, Steve Hwang and Ron Szeto (“A10 Defendants”)

4

and Defendant Liang Han (collectively, “the parties”) that:

5
6
7

1.

The parties understand that the Court set June 21, 2012, as the deadline for the

submission of proposed Jury Instructions during the June 8, 2012, Case Management Conference.
2.

The parties have exchanged proposed jury instructions and are in the process of

8

meeting and conferring to identify areas of agreement and disagreement to narrow their disputes.

9

Brocade’s proposed jury instructions are attached hereto as Exhibit A and the jury instructions

10
11

proposed by the A10 Defendants and Defendant Liang Han are attached hereto as Exhibit B.
3.

In order for the parties to have sufficient time to narrow the areas of disagreement

12

requiring resolution by the Court, the parties will submit to the Court a set of agreed-to jury

13

instructions and a set of disputed jury instructions and objections by Tuesday, June 26, 2012.

14

4.

All other case management deadlines set by the Court during the June 8, 2012,

15

Case Management Conference and June 11, 2012, Case Management Order (D.I. 566) are

16

unaffected by this Stipulation.

17
18
19

Dated: June 21, 2012

20

Respectfully Submitted,
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
/s/ Siddhartha M. Venkatesan
SIDDHARTHA M. VENKATESAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

21
22
23
24

Dated: June 21, 2012

25

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
/s/ Scott R. Mosko
SCOTT R. MOSKO
Attorneys for Defendants
A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR
JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVEN HWANG

26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S ILICON VALLEY

OHSUSA:750920387.2

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SUBMISSION OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 LHK

Case5:10-cv-03428-LHK Document600 Filed06/21/12 Page3 of 3

1
2

Dated: June 21, 2012

LOSCH & EHRLICH

3

/s/ Joseph Ehrlich
JOSEPH EHRLICH
Attorneys for Defendant
LIANG HAN

4
5

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from each of the other signatories pursuant to
General Order 45(X)(B).

6
7
8

ORDER

9
10

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and request, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

June 26, 2012
Dated: ______________________
Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S ILICON VALLEY

OHSUSA:750920387.2

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SUBMISSION OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 LHK