Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 897

ORDER RE BROCADE'S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION RE TRADE SECRETS, re 848 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 2/21/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, ) INC., ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) A10 NETWORKS, INC., ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C 10-3428 PSG ORDER RE BROCADE’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION RE TRADE SECRETS (Re: Docket Nos. 783, 848) 18 The court GRANTS Brocade's request for a permanent injunction regarding the trade 19 secrets and DENIES Brocade's request to strike A10's expert declarations. Because of possible 20 confidential information in the court's decision, the court will email to the parties' respective 21 counsel the unredacted version of the order and invites proposed redactions to the order within 22 seven days. 23 The court advises the parties to be disciplined in their requests for redactions and to heed 24 the requirement of Civil L.R. 79-5 that sealing requests be "narrowly tailored." Failure to comply 25 with Civil L.R. 79-5 subjects the parties to the risk that the court will substitute its own redactions 26 or publish the full text of the order. Following review of the parties' requests, the court will publish 27 to the docket a redacted version of its order. 28 1 Case No.: C 10-03428 PSG ORDER 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: February 21, 2013 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: C 10-03428 PSG ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?