Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 916

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO PERMANENTLY REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS (D.I. 573-1 AND D.I. 573-2), granting 589 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 3/25/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ALLEN J. RUBY (STATE BAR NO. 47109) allen.ruby@skadden.com SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: 650-470-4500 / Facsimile: 650-470-4570 FABIO E. MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825) fmarino@mwe.com MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: 650-815-7400 / Facsimile: 650-815-7401 DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224) dmingrone@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 / Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and STEVEN HWANG, an individual, Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 LHK STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMANENTLY REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS (D.I. 573-1 AND D.I. 573-2) Judge: Honorable Lucy H. Koh Defendants and Counterclaimants. 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW S ILICON VALLEY OHSUSA:750905905.2 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 LHK 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiffs Brocade Communications 2 Systems, Inc. and Foundry Networks, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants A10 3 Networks, Inc., Lee Chen, Rajkumar Jalan, Ron Szeto, and Liang Han as follows: 4 On Tuesday, June 12, 2012, Plaintiffs’ counsel filed an opposition to Defendant A10 5 Networks, Inc.’s Objections to Plaintiffs’ Identification of Claims for Trial. Plaintiffs’ counsel 6 filed the Declaration of Denise Mingrone in support of these Objections, which attached two 7 exhibits. Exhibit A was filed as Docket No. 573-1 and Exhibit B was filed as Docket No. 573-2. 8 9 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 79.5(b), when electronically filed, Plaintiffs’ counsel inadvertently filed Exhibits A and B to the Mingrone Declaration as public documents. Plaintiffs’ counsel submits that these documents should have been filed under seal in their entirety instead. 11 After discovery of the error the next morning, Plaintiffs’ counsel contacted the ECF Help 12 Desk by email and telephone. The Help Disk put a temporary lock on the documents. Plaintiffs’ 13 counsel subsequently re-efiled a corrected version of the Mingrone Declaration with Exhibits A 14 and B filed under seal. D.I. 574. Plaintiffs’ counsel then filed an Administrative Motion to Seal 15 Exhibits A and B to this corrected filing. D.I. 575. 16 Plaintiffs’ counsel contacted counsel for the Defendants, who have agreed to stipulate to 17 this request that the inadvertently public-filed Exhibits A and B (Docket Nos. 573-1 and 573-2) 18 be permanently deleted from the docket. 19 20 21 Dated: June 18, 2012 22 Respectfully Submitted, ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP /s/ Siddhartha M. Venkatesan SIDDHARTHA M. VENKATESAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW S ILICON VALLEY OHSUSA:750905905.2 -1- STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 LHK 1 Dated: June 18, 2012 2 /s/ Scott R. Mosko SCOTT R. MOSKO Attorneys for Defendants A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVEN HWANG 3 4 5 6 7 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. Dated: June 18, 2012 LOSCH & EHRLICH /s/ Joseph Ehrlich JOSEPH EHRLICH Attorneys for Defendant LIANG HAN 8 9 10 Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories pursuant to General Order 45(X)(B). 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and request, IT IS SO ORDERED. Exhibits A and B to the June 12, 2012 Declaration of Denise M. Mingrone in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to A10’s Objections, filed as Docket Numbers 573-1 and 573-2, shall be removed from the Court’s Docket. Dated: _________________ March 25, 2013 Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW S ILICON VALLEY OHSUSA:750905905.2 -2- STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?