Gardias v. The California State University, San Jose State University

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 plaintiff's request to continue motion hearing. Hearing re 19 defendant's Motion to Consolidate Cases and 20 defendant's Motion for Pre-Filing Order continued to 5/31/2011, 10:00 AM. Plaintiff's opposition papers due 5/10/2011. Defendant's reply papers due by 5/17/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/25/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED 04-25-2011* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 No. PIOTR J. GARDIAS, For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 C10-03437 HRL 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY; SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY, 16 [Re: Docket No. 24] Defendant. / 17 18 The court having received no objection to plaintiff’s request for a continuance, the May 19 3, 2011 hearing on defendant’s Motion to Consolidate Cases (Docket No. 19) and Motion for 20 Pre-Filing Order (Docket No. 20) is continued to May 31, 2011, 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2. 21 Plaintiff’s opposition papers shall be filed by May 10, 2011. Defendant’s reply papers shall be 22 filed by May 17, 2011. 23 SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: April 25, 2011 ________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Mary Susan Cain-Simon Mary.CainSimon@doj.ca.gov, ECFCoordinator@doj.ca.gov, Leticia.MartinezCarter@doj.ca.gov 3 4 Notice mailed to: 5 Piotr J. Gardias 72 Floyd St. San Jose, CA 95110 6 7 Pro Se Plaintiff 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?