Gardias v. The California State University, San Jose State University
Filing
25
ORDER granting 24 plaintiff's request to continue motion hearing. Hearing re 19 defendant's Motion to Consolidate Cases and 20 defendant's Motion for Pre-Filing Order continued to 5/31/2011, 10:00 AM. Plaintiff's opposition papers due 5/10/2011. Defendant's reply papers due by 5/17/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/25/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2011)
1
2
*E-FILED 04-25-2011*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
No.
PIOTR J. GARDIAS,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
C10-03437 HRL
12
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO CONTINUE MOTION
HEARING
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY;
SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY,
16
[Re: Docket No. 24]
Defendant.
/
17
18
The court having received no objection to plaintiff’s request for a continuance, the May
19
3, 2011 hearing on defendant’s Motion to Consolidate Cases (Docket No. 19) and Motion for
20
Pre-Filing Order (Docket No. 20) is continued to May 31, 2011, 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2.
21
Plaintiff’s opposition papers shall be filed by May 10, 2011. Defendant’s reply papers shall be
22
filed by May 17, 2011.
23
SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
April 25, 2011
________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Mary Susan Cain-Simon Mary.CainSimon@doj.ca.gov, ECFCoordinator@doj.ca.gov,
Leticia.MartinezCarter@doj.ca.gov
3
4
Notice mailed to:
5
Piotr J. Gardias
72 Floyd St.
San Jose, CA 95110
6
7
Pro Se Plaintiff
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?