Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Childers et al

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE re 41 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/13/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881)
[e-mail]
Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235)
[e-mail]
J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp.
517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202
Glendale, California 91206
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Adobe Systems Incorporated
Derek H. Lim (SBN 209496)
[e-mail]
Melissa A. Horst (SBN 253032)
[e-mail]
Burnham Brown
A Professional Law Corporation
P.O. Box 119
Oakland, California 94604
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Maralyn M. English, admitted pro hac vice
[e-mail]
Snow, Christensen & Martineau
10 Exchange Place, Eleventh Floor
P.O. Box 45000
Salt Lake City, Utah 84145
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Adam Childers
and SoftwareMedia.com, Inc.

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
Adam Childers, an individual and d/b/a
)
www.softwaremedia.com; SoftwareMedia.com, )
Inc., and Does 1 – 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Adobe Systems Incorporated,

28
Adobe v. Childers, et al.: Joint Request to Extend ADR Deadline

-1-

Case No. C10-3571 JF
JOINT REQUEST TO EXTEND ADR
DEADLINE

1
2

PLAINTIFF Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Adobe” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its
counsel of record, Nicole L. Drey, of J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp., and Defendants Adam

3

Childers and SoftwareMedia.com, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their counsel of
4
5
6

record, Derek H. Lim, of Burnham Brown, A Professional Law Corporation, hereby stipulate and
agree as follows:
WHEREAS the Complaint was filed in the above-captioned matter on or about August 13,

7
8

2010;

9

WHEREAS Defendants filed their Answer to the Complaint on or about March 21, 2011;

10

WHEREAS the Court held a Case Management Conference on March 4, 2011, at which

11

time the Court ordered the Parties to complete ADR by July 15, 2011, and set a further case
12
13

management conference for that same date;
WHEREAS the Court referred this Action to Magistrate Judge Lloyd for a settlement

14
15

conference on or about March 23, 2011;

16

WHEREAS the Parties, thereafter, diligently attempted to schedule the settlement

17

conference but due to conflicting schedules and the limited availability of Magistrate Judge Lloyd

18

during the month of June, they are unable to schedule a settlement conference prior to July 15,

19

2011;
20

WHEREAS the Parties have currently scheduled a settlement conference before Magistrate

21
22

Judge Lloyd for July 29, 2011; and
WHEREAS no other Court deadlines will be affected by an extension of the ADR deadline.

23
24
25

///

26
27
28

///
Adobe v. Childers, et al.: Joint Request to Extend ADR Deadline

-2-

-----------------

5/13