Cheng v. Asture

Filing 8

SECOND INTERIM ORDER re: 2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/29/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)

Download PDF
Cheng v. Asture Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ** E-filed March 29, 2011 ** NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION BRIAN CHENG, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTURE, No. C10-03605 HRL SECOND INTERIM ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Re: Docket No. 2] Defendant. ____________________________________/ Before the Court is plaintiff Brian Cheng's ("Cheng") Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Docket No. 2. Cheng's submissions so far make clear that certain funds exist within a special needs trust, but that these funds are under the control of guardian Tomas Lucas ("Lucas"). See Docket No. 7. However, Cheng has not explained whether he asked Lucas to disburse any funds so that Cheng could pursue this action. Accordingly, if Cheng wishes to have the Court consider his application further, he must submit a declaration describing his efforts in this regard by April 15, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C10-03605 HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Dolly Marlo Trompeter DMTrompeterESQ@yahoo.com Please see General Order 45 Section IX C.2 and D; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to: Dolly Marlo Trompeter D.M. Trompeter, Esq. 2261 Market Street #185 San Francisco, CA 94114-1600 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?