Galaxy Internet Services v. Google, Inc.

Filing 16

Case transferred in from District of Massachusetts; Case Number 1:10-cv-10871. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.

Download PDF
Galaxy Internet Services v. Google, Inc. Doc. 1 CLOSED United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-10871-WGY Galaxy Internet Services v. Google, Inc. Assigned to: Judge William G. Young Demand: $9,999,000 Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question Plaintiff Galaxy Internet Services, Inc., on behalf of themselves , their customers, and all others similarly situated within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts represented by Robert H. Carp CarpLaw Offices, LLC 2nd Floor 100 Needham Street Newton, MA 02464 617-861-4529 Email: bob@gis.net ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Date Filed: 05/24/2010 Date Terminated: 08/24/2010 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Diversity V. Defendant GOOGLE, INC. a Delaware Corporation represented by David J. Burman Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, 40th Floor Seattle, WA 98101-3099 206-359-8426 Fax: 206-359-9426 Email: dburman@perkinscoie.com LEAD ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED James B. Conroy Donnelly, Conroy &Gelhaar, LLP One Beacon Street 33rd Floor Boston, MA 02108 617-720-2880 Fax: 617-720-3554 Email: jbc@dcglaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jocelyn L. Dyer Donnelly, Conroy &Gelhaar, LLP One Beacon Street 33rd Floor Boston, MA 02108 617-720-2880 Dockets.Justia.com Fax: 617-720-3554 Email: jld@dcglaw.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Date Filed 05/25/2010 # Ï1 Docket Text COMPLAINT Galaxy Internet Services, Inc., et al against GOOGLE, INC. Filing fee: $ 350, receipt number 0101-2919406 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by GOOGLE, INC., Galaxy Internet Services, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carp, Robert) (Entered: 05/25/2010) ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Chief Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Cummings, Mary) (Entered: 05/25/2010) Summons Issued as to GOOGLE, INC.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Cummings, Mary) (Entered: 05/25/2010) NOTICE of Appearance by James B. Conroy on behalf of GOOGLE, INC. (Conroy, James) (Entered: 06/10/2010) NOTICE by GOOGLE, INC. of Filing with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Conroy, James) (Entered: 06/10/2010) NOTICE of Appearance by Jocelyn L. Dyer on behalf of GOOGLE, INC. (Dyer, Jocelyn) (Entered: 06/11/2010) Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to June 29, 2010 to to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by GOOGLE, INC..(Conroy, James) (Entered: 06/14/2010) MEMORANDUM in Support re 6 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to June 29, 2010 to to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by GOOGLE, INC.. (Conroy, James) (Entered: 06/14/2010) Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 6 Motion for Extension of Time to answer (Smith, Bonnie) (Entered: 06/14/2010) Set/Reset Answer Deadlines for GOOGLE, INC.. (Smith, Bonnie) (Entered: 06/14/2010) Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of David J. Burman Filing fee: $ 50, receipt number 0101-2946464 by GOOGLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Dyer, Jocelyn) (Entered: 06/15/2010) Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added David J. Burman. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 06/16/2010) MOTION to Stay Pretrial Deadlines by GOOGLE, INC..(Conroy, James) (Entered: 06/29/2010) MEMORANDUM in Support re 9 MOTION to Stay Pretrial Deadlines filed by GOOGLE, INC.. (Conroy, James) (Entered: 06/29/2010) Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: Motion allowed and pre trial deadlines are stayed for 30 days or until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation rules, whichever shall first occur. The Court notes that it takes this action solely because plaintiff 05/25/2010 Ï 05/25/2010 Ï2 06/10/2010 06/10/2010 06/11/2010 06/14/2010 06/14/2010 Ï3 Ï4 Ï5 Ï6 Ï7 06/14/2010 06/14/2010 06/15/2010 Ï Ï Ï8 06/16/2010 06/29/2010 06/29/2010 07/14/2010 Ï Ï9 Ï 10 Ï appears to have interposed no timely objection. The Court notes that it is fully prepared to move this case to a trial no later than September, 2011, a fact which counsel are ordered to bring to the attention of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. There shall be no further continuances re 9 MOTION to Stay Pretrial Deadlines (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 07/14/2010) 08/03/2010 08/11/2010 08/11/2010 08/11/2010 08/23/2010 08/24/2010 Ï 11 Ï 12 Ï 13 Ï Ï 14 Ï 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by GOOGLE, INC.. (Dyer, Jocelyn) (Entered: 08/03/2010) Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by GOOGLE, INC..(Conroy, James) (Entered: 08/11/2010) MEMORANDUM in Support re 12 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by GOOGLE, INC.. (Conroy, James) (Entered: 08/11/2010) Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 12 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 08/11/2010) Emailed Informational copy of MDL Conditional Transfer Order in MDL Case 2184 received from the mdl panel. (Jones, Sherry) (Entered: 08/23/2010) Certified copy of MDL Conditional Transfer Order in MDL Case 2184 received from the Northern District of California requesting electronic transfer of case for consolidated pretrial proceedings. (Jones, Sherry) (Entered: 08/24/2010) Case transferred electronically to the Northern District of California pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order entered by the MDL Panel on 8/17/10.(Jones, Sherry) (Entered: 08/24/2010) 08/24/2010 Ï

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?