Galaxy Internet Services v. Google, Inc.
Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to June 29, 2010 to to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by GOOGLE, INC..(Conroy, James)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GALAXY INTERNET SERVICES, INC., on behalf of themselves, their customers, and all others similarly situated within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10 10871WGY
DEFENDANT'S ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Pursuant to Rule 6 (b) (1) (A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant Google Inc. ("Google") hereby moves, with the assent of plaintiff's counsel, that the deadline for filing a pleading responsive to the complaint filed in this case be extended by 14 days, from Tuesday, June 15, 2010 to Tuesday, June 29, 2010. In support of its motion, Google submits a two page Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Assented-to Motion To Extend Time To Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. GOOGLE INC., By its attorneys, /s/ James B. Conroy James B. Conroy (BBO# 096315) Jocelyn L. Dyer (BBO #660240) DONNELLY CONROY & GELHAAR LLP One Beacon Street, 33rd Floor Boston, MA 02108 Telephone: (617) 720-2880 Facsimile: (617) 720-3554 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org Dated: June 14, 2010
LOCAL RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that, as counsel for the defendant Google Inc., I have conferred with counsel for the plaintiffs in this case, who has assented to the foregoing motion. /s/ James B. Conroy James B. Conroy CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified in the Notice of Electronic Filing. The ECF system presently indicates that there are no non-registered participants. /s/ James B. Conroy James B. Conroy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?