French v. JDS Uniphase Corporation
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECING ADR PROCESS re 13 , Case referred to early neutral evaluation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/25/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2010)
UNITED STATES DISTRCT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOHN FRENCH
Plaintiff( s)~
CASE NO. CV 10-03645 JF STIPULATION AND ----------------(PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
v.
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORA TION~ a Delaware corporation. Defendant( s).
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. i 6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The paries agree to paricipate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
o Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ~ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
o Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR LR. 3-5)
Private Process:
o Pnvate ADR (please identif process and
provider)
The paries agree to hold the ADR session by:
iz the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date of
the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
o other requested deadline
Dated:October I ~, 2010
Dated: October 18, 2010
Dated:
Dated:
America" LegaINe', Iri.
ww.USCourtFomie.com
Dockets.Justia.com
-(PROPOSED) ORDER ----------------Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matteris hereby referred to:
o Non-binding Arbitration
i: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
o Mediation o Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session cg 90 days from the date of this order.
o other
IT is SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10/25/10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL
Amllrican LegalNal, Inc.
ww.USCounFol1.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?