Stanford Hospitals and Clinics , v. Clark County Education Association
Filing
12
ORDER re 8 ADR Phone Conference. Parties to schedule an ADR phone conference to be held in advance of 11/2/2010 case management conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/13/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2010)
Stanford Hospitals and Clinics , v. Clark County Education Association
Doc. 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION STANFORD HOSPITALS AND CLINICS, v. Plaintiff, No. C10-03674 HRL ORDER RE ADR PHONE CONFERENCE *E-FILED 10-13-2010*
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CLARK COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Defendant. /
The parties jointly request that this matter be referred for an early settlement conference with a judge. However, they have not filed a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by ADR L.R. 3-5(c). Accordingly, the parties are directed to contact the court's ADR Unit to schedule a phone conference to be held in advance of the November 2, 2010 case management conference. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5:10-cv-03674-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Barry Sullivan bsullivan@sacfirm.com, agrigorian@sacfirmonline.com Painey@braggdzlaw.com jstephenson@sacfirmonline.com rlovich@sacfirmonline.com, ral@lovichlaw.com sfrisch@sacfirm.com
Edward Garcia , Jr
Joy Young Stephenson Richard Alan Lovich Sara Hilary Frisch
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?