Camsoft Data Systems Inc v. Southern Electronics Supply Inc et al
Filing
41
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Mediation Deadline re 38 Stipulation. Mediation deadline 7/8/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/24/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB No. 184915)
ppremo@fenwick.com
THEIS FINLEV (CSB No. 264879)
tfinlev@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: (650) 988-8500
Facsimile: (650) 938-5200
RICHARD KELLNER (CSB No. 171416)
rlk@kbklawyers.com
KAREN LIAO (CSB No. 256072)
kliao@kbklawyers.com
KABATECK KELLNER LLP
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 217-5000
Facsimile: (213) 217-5010
Attorneys for Defendant
TROPOS NETWORKS INC.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAMSOFT DATA SYSTEMS INC.
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
MOUNTAIN VIEW
CAMSOFT DATA SYSTEMS INC.,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
Case No. CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG)
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
TROPOS NETWORKS INC.,
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MEDIATION DEADLINE
Complaint Filed:
August 23, 2010
16
Defendant.
17
18
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2010, the above-captioned action was transferred to this
19
20
Court from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana;
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2010, this matter was assigned to the Honorable Lucy H.
21
22
23
24
25
Koh;
WHEREAS, on March 9, 2011, plaintiff Camsoft Data Systems, Inc. (“Camsoft”) filed a
First Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2011, Judge Koh entered a Case Management Order calling
26
for the above-captioned matter to complete court-sponsored mediation within 90 days of that
27
Order, which is June 21, 2011;
28
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2011, Camsoft filed a Second Amended Complaint;
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MEDIATION DEADLINE
1
CASE NO.: CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG)
1
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2011, the Court appointed Mark LeHocky as Mediator;
2
WHEREAS, per stipulation, on April 22, 2011, defendant Tropos filed its Answer to the
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
Second Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, on April 25, 2011, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Edward J.
Davila (the “Reassignment Order);
WHEREAS, per the Reassignment Order, the June 21, 2011 deadline for completing
court-sponsored mediation appeared to remain in effect;
WHEREAS, the parties to this matter and the court-appointed mediator, Mr. LeHocky,
have agreed to conduct the said mediation on July 8, 2011;
WHEREAS, the parties seek an extension of the deadline to complete mediation such that
the parties are not in violation of this Court’s Case Management Order;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, CONSENTED AND AGREED TO by and between
the parties that the deadline to complete mediation in this action is extended to July 8, 2011.
14
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
17
Dated: June 17, 2011
18
FENWICK & WEST LLP
By:
19
Attorneys for Defendant Tropos Networks Inc.
20
21
/s/ Patrick Premo
Patrick E. Premo
Dated: June 17, 2011
KABATECK BROWN & KELLNER, LLP
22
By:
23
24
/s/ Richard Kellner
Richard Kellner
Attorneys for Plaintiff Camsoft Data Systems,
Inc.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MEDIATION DEADLINE
2
CASE NO.: CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG)
1
2
3
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
the signatory indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
4
/s/ Patrick Premo
Patrick Premo
5
6
7
ORDER
8
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
10
11
Dated: June 24, 2011
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Court Judge
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MEDIATION DEADLINE
3
CASE NO.: CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?