Camsoft Data Systems Inc v. Southern Electronics Supply Inc et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Mediation Deadline re 38 Stipulation. Mediation deadline 7/8/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/24/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB No. 184915) ppremo@fenwick.com THEIS FINLEV (CSB No. 264879) tfinlev@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 RICHARD KELLNER (CSB No. 171416) rlk@kbklawyers.com KAREN LIAO (CSB No. 256072) kliao@kbklawyers.com KABATECK KELLNER LLP 644 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 217-5000 Facsimile: (213) 217-5010 Attorneys for Defendant TROPOS NETWORKS INC. Attorneys for Plaintiff CAMSOFT DATA SYSTEMS INC. 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION MOUNTAIN VIEW CAMSOFT DATA SYSTEMS INC., ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 Case No. CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG) 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 TROPOS NETWORKS INC., STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE Complaint Filed: August 23, 2010 16 Defendant. 17 18 WHEREAS, on August 23, 2010, the above-captioned action was transferred to this 19 20 Court from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana; WHEREAS, on December 16, 2010, this matter was assigned to the Honorable Lucy H. 21 22 23 24 25 Koh; WHEREAS, on March 9, 2011, plaintiff Camsoft Data Systems, Inc. (“Camsoft”) filed a First Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, on March 23, 2011, Judge Koh entered a Case Management Order calling 26 for the above-captioned matter to complete court-sponsored mediation within 90 days of that 27 Order, which is June 21, 2011; 28 WHEREAS, on April 1, 2011, Camsoft filed a Second Amended Complaint; STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE 1 CASE NO.: CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG) 1 WHEREAS, on April 22, 2011, the Court appointed Mark LeHocky as Mediator; 2 WHEREAS, per stipulation, on April 22, 2011, defendant Tropos filed its Answer to the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, on April 25, 2011, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Edward J. Davila (the “Reassignment Order); WHEREAS, per the Reassignment Order, the June 21, 2011 deadline for completing court-sponsored mediation appeared to remain in effect; WHEREAS, the parties to this matter and the court-appointed mediator, Mr. LeHocky, have agreed to conduct the said mediation on July 8, 2011; WHEREAS, the parties seek an extension of the deadline to complete mediation such that the parties are not in violation of this Court’s Case Management Order; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, CONSENTED AND AGREED TO by and between the parties that the deadline to complete mediation in this action is extended to July 8, 2011. 14 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 17 Dated: June 17, 2011 18 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: 19 Attorneys for Defendant Tropos Networks Inc. 20 21 /s/ Patrick Premo Patrick E. Premo Dated: June 17, 2011 KABATECK BROWN & KELLNER, LLP 22 By: 23 24 /s/ Richard Kellner Richard Kellner Attorneys for Plaintiff Camsoft Data Systems, Inc. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE 2 CASE NO.: CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG) 1 2 3 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 4 /s/ Patrick Premo Patrick Premo 5 6 7 ORDER 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 10 11 Dated: June 24, 2011 The Honorable Edward J. Davila United States District Court Judge MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE 3 CASE NO.: CV 10-3725 EJD (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?