Camsoft Data Systems Inc v. Southern Electronics Supply Inc et al
Filing
52
Order Granting 50 Motion to Appear by Telephone for 8/19/2011 Case Management Conference as to Richard L. Kellner for Plaintiff Camsoft Data Systems, Inc. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 8/11/2011.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RICHARD L. KELLNER, SBN 171416
(rlk@kbklawyers.com)
KAREN LIAO, SBN 256072
(kliao@kbklawyers.com)
KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 217-5000
Facsimile: (213) 217-5010
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Camsoft Data Systems, Inc.
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
CAMSOFT DATA SYSTEMS, Inc.,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
TROPOS NETWORKS, INC., RON
SEGE, ALLEN CARR, DAVE
18 HANNA;
17
19
CASE NO. 10-CV-03725 EJD
Assigned to Hon. Edward J. Davila
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE OF
COUNSEL AT AUGUST 19, 2011
STATUS CONFERENCE
[Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-11]
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION RE TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
(10-CV-03725 EJD)
1
Plaintiff CamSoft Data Systems, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion pursuant to Civ.
2
L.R. 7-11, to permit Plaintiff’s counsel, Richard L. Kellner of Kabateck Brown Kellner
3
LLP to appear telephonically at the Status Conference scheduled for August 19, 2011 at
4
10:00 a.m. The Court, having considered the papers on the motion, and good cause
5
having been shown, hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion. Plaintiff’s counsel, Richard L.
6
Kellner, may appear at the August 19, 2011 Status Conference by telephone.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
12
August 11, 2011
Dated: _____________________
____________________________
Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION RE TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
(10-CV-03725 EJD)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?