Heim v. The Estate of Donald T. Heim, Maxine Heim et al

Filing 103

ORDER DENYING 98 STIPULATION FOR FILING AMENDED ANSWER. Parties may resubmit this stipulation with the proposed amended pleading attached for the court's review. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/9/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)

6

Attorneys for Third Party Defendant
AMERICAN LAUNDRY MACHINERY, 'INC.

ER

a rd J . D

R NIA

dw
J u d ge E

H

5

RT

4

455 Market Street, Suite 1420
,San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: (415) 88'2-7770; 'Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

avila

LI

3

NO

2

D

A

MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP

DENIE

FO

S

UNIT
ED

ROBERTN. BERG, ESQ., SBN 99319

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

, 9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA '

10
11

MARK HElM, an individual,

12

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR FILING
v.
AMENDED ANSWER OF THIRD
PARTY DEFENDANT AMERICAN
THE ESTATE OF DONALD T. HElM, ) LAUNDRY MACHINERY, INC. TO
MAXINE HElM, an individual, and
) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT OF
CITY OF WATSONVILLE;
) MAXINE HElM

13
14

15
16

Plaintiff,

17
Defendants.

18

19

MAXINE HElM,

20
,Third Party Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
MULTlMATIC DRY CLEANING
MACHINE CORPORATION, a New
York Corporation; MULTlMATIC
CORPORATION, a New Jersey
Corporation, formerly known as
Multimatic Dry Cleaning Machine
Corporation; MULTlMATIC LLC, a
New Jersey limited liability company,

) CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03816 EJD
)

)
)
)
)

)
) .

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

------------

,1

ORDER FOR FILING AMENDED ANSWER OF THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT AMERICAN LAUNDRY

MACHINERY, INC. TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT OF MAXINE HElM

as successor in interest to Multimatic
Corporation and Multimatic Dry
Cleaning Machine Corporation, AND
3 THE KIRRBERG CORPORATION, a
4 New Jersey Corporation, formerly
known as Multimatic Corporation;
5 American Laundry Machinery, Inc.;
6 William Burgstrom, an Individual; the
Estate ofEmie Webb; and the Project
7 One Limited Partnership,
1
2

)
)
)
)
)
)

8

Third Party Defendal1ts.

9
10

11

ORDER

12
13
14

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, and for good cause showing, it is

15

ordered that AMERICAN LAUNDRY MACHINE, INC. may file an Amended

16

Answer to the Third-Party Complaint of MAXINE HElM.

17

Parties may resubmit this stipulation with the proposed amended pleading attached
for the court's review.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED:

19

20

DATED:

September 9, 2011

_

21
22
23

HON. HOWARD R. LLOYD
EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25

26
27
28
2
ORDER FOR FILING AMENDED ANSWER OF THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT AMERICAN LAUNDRY

MACHINERY, INC. TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT OF MAXINE HElM