Heim v. The Estate of Donald T. Heim, Maxine Heim et al

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time of Multimatic LLC and The Kirrberg Corporation to Respond to Maxine Heim's Third Party Complaint re 41 Stipulation. Response due 5/27/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/16/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2011)

S

7
8

ER

R NIA
FO

. D av i l a

LI

J

w a rd J
u d ge E d

H

6

RT

5

NO

4

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

A

3

UNIT
ED

2

RICHARD A. DONGELL (SBN 128083)
([e-mail])
THOMAS F. VANDENBURG (SBN 163446)
([e-mail])
IAN P. CULVER (SBN 245106)
([e-mail])
DONGELL LAWRENCE FINNEY LLP
707 Wilshire Boulevard, 45th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-3609
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

Attorneys for Third Party Defendants
MULTIMATIC LLC and THE KIRRBERG CORPORATION,
formerly known as Multimatic Corporation

F
D IS T IC T O
R

9

5/16/2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

C

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE

11

MARK HEIM, an individual,

12

Honorable Edward J. Davila
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

Case No.: 5:10-CV-03816 EJD

v.
THE ESTATE OF DONALD T. HEIM;
MAXINE HEIM, an individual; and CITY OF
WATSONVILLE,

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME OF
MULTIMATIC LLC AND THE
KIRRBERG CORPORATION TO
RESPOND TO MAXINE HEIM’S THIRD
PARTY COMPLAINT
Local Rule 6-1(a)

17

Defendants.

18
19

MAXINE HEIM,

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Third Party Plaintiff,
v.
MULTIMATIC CORPORATION, a New
Jersey corporation, formerly known as
Multimatic Dry Cleaning Machine Corporation;
MULTIMATIC LLC, a New Jersey limited
liability company, as successor in interest to
Multimatic Corporation and Multimatic Dry
Cleaning Machine Corporation; and THE
KIRRBERG CORPORATION, a New Jersey
corporation, formerly known as Multimatic
Corporation,
Third Party Defendants.

ACTION FILED:
TRIAL DATE:

August 26, 2010
None Set

1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME OF MULTIMATIC LLC AND THE KIRRBERG
CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO MAXINE HEIM’S THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Third Party Plaintiff MAXINE HEIM and Third

1
2

Party Defendants MULTIMATIC LLC and THE KIRRBERG CORPORATION, formerly

3

known as Multimatic Corporation, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that

4

Third Party Defendants MULTIMATIC LLC and THE KIRRBERG CORPORATION, formerly

5

known as Multimatic Corporation, shall have until May 27, 2011, to respond to MAXINE

6

HEIM’s Third Party Complaint.
This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

7
8
9

Court order.
SO STIPULATED.

10
11

DATED: May 13, 2011

DONGELL LAWRENCE FINNEY LLP

12
By: _/s/ Ian P. Culver________________________
Ian P. Culver
Attorneys for Third Party Defendants
MULTIMATIC LLC and THE KIRRBERG
CORPORATION, formerly known as Multimatic
Corporation

13
14
15
16
17
18

DATED: May 13, 2011

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

19
By: _/s/ Danielle DeSmeth____________________
Danielle DeSmeth
Attorneys for Third Party Plaintiff
MAXINE HEIM

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1414-038/61791

2
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME OF MULTIMATIC LLC AND THE KIRRBERG
CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO MAXINE HEIM’S THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT