Orcilla et al v. Bank Of America et al

Filing 12

ORDER GRANTING 10 Plaintiffs' Motion for Permission to Register on ECF. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this order to the PACER Service Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 09/14/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)

Download PDF
Orcilla et al v. Bank Of America et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION ** E-filed September 14, 2010 ** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION VIRGILIO and TEODORA ORCILLA, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Defendants. / [Re: Docket No. 10] No. C10-03931 HRL ORDER GRANTING PRO SE LITIGANTS PERMISSION TO REGISTER ON ECF United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs appearing pro se seek permission of the court for an ECF/PACER account and permission to file by fax or by email. (Docket No. 10.) Plaintiffs request an ECF or PACER account to check the status of this case and to file documents electronically. This Court previously issued an order granting Plaintiffs' applications to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. (Docket No. 5.) The court finds that Plaintiffs fall within the class of users eligible for a fee exemption listed in the Electronic Public Access fee schedule adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States Courts and have demonstrated that a fee exemption to access the docket in this action electronically is necessary to avoid unreasonable burdens. Plaintiffs are therefore exempt from fees for PACER usage under $10 per quarterly billing cycle to access the electronic case files for this action maintained in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, to the extent such use is incurred in the course of filing and Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 accessing documents in this action. Plaintiffs shall not be exempt from the payment of fees incurred in connection with other uses of the ECF or PACER system in this court. Plaintiffs may register for ECF at the following website: https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/newreg/index.html. Plaintiffs must also register on PACER to view documents and the docket sheet: www.pacer.gov. Plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and all general orders and local rules pertaining to electronic filing including General Order 45 which requires in part that parties must provide the judge's chambers with a paper copy of each document that is filed electronically, marked "Chambers Copy." By registering, Plaintiffs accept responsibility for all technical requirements and computer-related tasks associated with participation in the ECF program. After registering on ECF and PACER, Plaintiffs must file a notice of ECF registration that Plaintiffs have made available an electronic mail address for service of papers electronically filed on the docket. Upon filing of such notice, the court will designate this action for the ECF program. This exemption may be revoked at the discretion of the court at any time. The clerk of the court shall send a copy of this order to the PACER Service Center. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C10-03931 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Teodora Orcilia lglbgl@live.com Virgilio Orcilla lglbgl@live.com Notice will be made by other means to: Virgilio Orcilla 2975 Winwood Way San Jose, CA 95148 Teodora Orcilia 2975 Winwood Way San Jose, CA 95148 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?