Orcilla et al v. Bank Of America et al

Filing 34

ORDER (1) CONTINUING initial case management conference and (2) DENYING AS MOOT 33 Defendants' motion to appear by telephone. In light of Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint, the initial case management conference, currently set for November 16, 2010, is CONTINUED to January 18, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement no later than Januar y 11, 2011. The parties are also reminded that this civil case has been randomly assigned to a magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. Accordingly, all parties who have not yet done so shall, no later than November 16, 2010, s hall file either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 73-1. The consent and declination forms are available at the Clerks Office and may also be obtained from the courts website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/4/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010)

Download PDF
Orcilla et al v. Bank Of America et al Doc. 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ** E-filed November 4, 2010 ** NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION VIRGILIO and TEODORA ORCILLA, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ No. C10-03931 HRL ORDER (1) CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AS MOOT [Re: Docket Nos. 4 & 33] United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California In light of Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint, the initial case management conference, currently set for November 16, 2010, is CONTINUED to January 18, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement no later than January 11, 2011. Because of this continuance, Defendants' counsel's request to appear by telephone (Docket No. 33) is DENIED AS MOOT. The parties are also reminded that this civil case has been randomly assigned to a magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. Accordingly, all parties who have not yet done so shall, no later than November 16, 2010, shall file either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 73-1. The consent and Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 declination forms are available at the Clerk's Office and may also be obtained from the court's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C10-03931 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Karen Page Shelar Virgilio Llarenas Orcilla shelark@bryancave.com, kedra.chan@bryancave.com lglbgl@live.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?