Fujitsu Limited v. Belkin International, Inc. et al
Filing
131
ORDER re 130 Notice of Withdrawal of Attorneys. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/2/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
FUJITSU LIMITED,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BELKIN, )
INC.; D-LINK CORPORATION; D-LINK
)
SYSTEMS, INC.; NETGEAR, INC.; ZYXEL )
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; and )
ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-03972-LHK
ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF
WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS
(re: dkt. #130)
18
19
On June 1, 2011, attorneys Ryan K. Yagura and Vision L. Winter, co-counsel for
20
Defendants Belkin International, Inc. and Belkin, Inc. (collectively “Belkin”), filed a notice of
21
withdrawal as counsel. See Dkt. #130. However, Civil Local Rule 11-5(a) states: “Counsel may
22
not withdraw from an action until relieved by order of Court after written notice has been given
23
reasonably in advance to the client and to all other parties who have appeared in the case.”
24
It is not clear to the Court whether counsel have provided noticed and received consent to
25
withdraw from Belkin. Accordingly, the attorneys seeking withdrawal should file an
26
administrative motion briefly explaining their request to withdraw and informing the Court of
27
28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-03972-LHK
ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS
1
Belkin’s position on their withdrawal. See Civ. L.R. 7-11.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: June 2, 2011
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 10-CV-03972-LHK
ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?