Fujitsu Limited v. Belkin International, Inc. et al

Filing 131

ORDER re 130 Notice of Withdrawal of Attorneys. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/2/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 FUJITSU LIMITED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BELKIN, ) INC.; D-LINK CORPORATION; D-LINK ) SYSTEMS, INC.; NETGEAR, INC.; ZYXEL ) COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; and ) ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-03972-LHK ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS (re: dkt. #130) 18 19 On June 1, 2011, attorneys Ryan K. Yagura and Vision L. Winter, co-counsel for 20 Defendants Belkin International, Inc. and Belkin, Inc. (collectively “Belkin”), filed a notice of 21 withdrawal as counsel. See Dkt. #130. However, Civil Local Rule 11-5(a) states: “Counsel may 22 not withdraw from an action until relieved by order of Court after written notice has been given 23 reasonably in advance to the client and to all other parties who have appeared in the case.” 24 It is not clear to the Court whether counsel have provided noticed and received consent to 25 withdraw from Belkin. Accordingly, the attorneys seeking withdrawal should file an 26 administrative motion briefly explaining their request to withdraw and informing the Court of 27 28 1 Case No.: 10-CV-03972-LHK ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS 1 Belkin’s position on their withdrawal. See Civ. L.R. 7-11. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: June 2, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 10-CV-03972-LHK ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?