Fujitsu Limited v. Belkin International, Inc. et al
Filing
161
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF FUJITSU LIMITED AND DEFENDANT NETGEAR, INC.'S JULY 28, 2011 JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING UNRESOLVED ESI ISSUES re 159 Statement filed by Fujitsu Limited. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on August 1, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
FUJITSU LIMITED,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET
)
AL.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
Case No.: C 10-03972 LHK (PSG)
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF FUJITSU
LIMITED AND DEFENDANT
NETGEAR, INC.’S JULY 28, 2011
JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING
UNRESOLVED ESI ISSUES
(Docket No. 159)
Pursuant to paragraph 2 of the Stipulation and Order re Discovery of Electronically Stored
19
Information,1 Plaintiff Fujitsu Limited (“Fujitsu”) and Defendant Netgear, Inc. (“Netgear”)
20
submitted a joint request to the undersigned for expedited resolution. Earlier today, the parties
21
appeared telephonically for hearing. Having reviewed the parties’ joint submission and considered
22
the arguments of counsel,
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Netgear’s ESI custodians shall include all of the individuals
named in its initial disclosures as well as Peter Newton.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than August 2, 2011 at 5PM, the parties shall meet
26
and confer on proposed search terms in an effort to narrow the search terms applicable to Netgear’s
27
technical personnel. In the event, the parties are unable to agree on proposed search terms, the
28
1
See Docket No. 154.
ORDER, page 1
1
parties shall file a joint submission no later than August 4, 2011 at 5PM and contact the courtroom
2
deputy, Oscar Rivera, to schedule a further hearing.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 1, 2011
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER, page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?