Fujitsu Limited v. Belkin International, Inc. et al
Filing
205
ORDER re 204 Stipulation Continuing Case Management Conference to 2/1/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/16/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)
Case5:10-cv-03972-LHK Document204
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Filed12/15/11 Page1 of 4
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Robert D. Fram (rfram@cov.com) (CA Bar No. 126750)
Thomas E. Garten (tgarten@cov.com) (CA Bar No. 247122)
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111‐5356
Telephone: (415) 591‐6000
Facsimile: (415) 591‐6091
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Philip A. Irwin (pirwin@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice)
The New York Times Building
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018‐1405
Telephone: (212) 841‐1000
Facsimile: (212) 841‐1010
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Gary M. Rubman (grubman@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice)
R. Jason Fowler (jfowler@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice)
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004‐2401
Telephone: (202) 662‐6000
Facsimile: (202) 662‐6291
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fujitsu Limited
[COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
FUJITSU LIMITED,
Case No. 10‐cv‐03972‐LHK (PSG)
Plaintiff,
v.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER POSTPONING THE CASE
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., BELKIN,
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
INC., D‐LINK CORPORATION, D‐LINK
SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 21, 2011
SYSTEMS, INC., NETGEAR, INC., ZYXEL
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, and
ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Before: The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
Defendant.
Discovery Matters Assigned to:
Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal
24
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10‐cv‐03972‐LHK (PSG)
Case5:10-cv-03972-LHK Document204
1
Filed12/15/11 Page2 of 4
Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6‐2 and 7‐12, Plaintiff
2
Fujitsu Limited and Defendants Belkin International, Inc., Belkin, Inc., D‐Link Corporation,
3
D‐Link Systems, Inc. NETGEAR, Inc., ZyXEL Communications Corporation, and ZyXEL
4
Communications, Inc. hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order
5
postponing the December 21, 2011 Case Management Conference:
6
On November 2, 2011, the Court issued a Notice (Dkt. No. 201) setting the next Case
7
Management Conference (“CMC”) for Wednesday, December 21, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. The
8
CMC was scheduled so that it would take place after the court‐ordered mediation on
9
December 14‐15, 2011. As further ordered by the Court (Dkt. No. 203), the parties’ case
10
management statement was postponed until December 19, 2011 so that the statement
11
could include a report on the mediation.
12
On December 14, 2011, the parties participated in a private mediation with Judge
13
Edward A. Infante. The parties did not reach any settlements and canceled the optional
14
second day of mediation scheduled for December 15, 2011. The parties’ positions were
15
simply too far apart.
16
17
18
The parties therefore believe that it will be more productive if the next Case
Management Conference occurs after the Court issues its Markman ruling.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED AND REQUESTED that the Court
19
postpone the next Case Management Conference until a reasonable time after the
20
Markman ruling.
21
22
23
DATE: December 15, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
By: /s/ Thomas E. Garten1
24
25
26
27
28
1 In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories hereto.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10‐cv‐03972‐LHK (PSG)
1
Case5:10-cv-03972-LHK Document204
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DATE: December 15, 2011
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Filed12/15/11 Page3 of 4
Robert D. Fram (rfram@cov.com)
Thomas E. Garten (tgarten@cov.com)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111‐5356
Telephone: (415) 591‐6000
Facsimile: (415) 591‐6091
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant FUJITSU LIMITED
By: /s/ Duncan Palmatier
Duncan Palmatier (CA Bar No. 116692)
E‐mail: dpalm@dpalmlaw.com
S.J. Christine Yang (CA Bar No. 102048)
E‐mail: cyang@sjclawpc.com
Victoria Der‐Lung Hao (admitted pro hac vice)
E‐mail: vhao@sjclawpc.com
The Law Office of S.J. Christine Yang
17220 Newhope Street, Suites 101 & 102
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Telephone: (714) 641‐4022
Facsimile: (714) 641‐2082
Attorneys for Defendants D‐LINK CORPORATION,
D‐LINK SYSTEMS, INC., ZYXEL
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, and ZYXEL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
17
18
DATE: December 15, 2011
By: /s/ David Enzminger
19
20
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
David Enzminger (CA Bar No. 137065)
E‐mail: denzminger@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 615‐1780
Facsimile: (213) 615‐1750
Attorneys for Defendants BELKIN
INTERNATIONAL INC. and BELKIN, INC.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10‐cv‐03972‐LHK (PSG)
2
Case5:10-cv-03972-LHK Document204
1
DATE: December 15, 2011
2
REED SMITH LLP
By: /s/ William Overend
3
4
Filed12/15/11 Page4 of 4
5
6
7
8
William R. Overend (CA Bar No. 180209)
E‐mail: woverend@reedsmith.com
John P. Bovich (CA Bar No. 150688)
E‐mail: jbovich@reedsmith.com
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105‐3659
Telephone: (415) 543‐8700
Facsimile: (415) 391‐8269
Attorneys for Defendant NETGEAR, INC.
9
10
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The case management conference is
hereby continued from December 21, 2011 to February 1, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
15
December 16
DATE: _________________, 2011 By: ______________________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge
16
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10‐cv‐03972‐LHK (PSG)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?