Fujitsu Limited v. Belkin International, Inc. et al

Filing 357

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 350 Stipulation as to Fujitsu Limited's Daubert Motion to Preclude Certain Testimony of Dr. Arthur Brody.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Robert D. Fram (rfram@cov.com) (CA Bar No. 126750) 2 Thomas E. Garten (tgarten@cov.com) (CA Bar No. 247122) Jeffrey T. Pearlman (jpearlman@cov.com) (CA Bar No. 254759) 3 One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5356 4 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 5 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 6 Philip A. Irwin (pirwin@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice) The New York Times Building 7 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018-1405 8 Telephone: (212) 841-1000 Facsimile: (212) 841-1010 9 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Gary M. Rubman (grubman@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice) 10 R. Jason Fowler (jfowler@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice) William E. Zapf (wzapf@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice) 11 Brianne Bharkhda (bbharkhda@cov.com) (admitted pro hac vice) 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 12 Washington, DC 20004-2401 Telephone: (202) 662-6000 13 Facsimile: (202) 662-6291 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Fujitsu Limited 15 [COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES] 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 19 FUJITSU LIMITED, 20 21 Plaintiff, v. 22 BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., BELKIN, INC., D-LINK CORPORATION, D-LINK 23 SYSTEMS, INC., NETGEAR, INC., ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, and 24 ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 25 Case No. 10-cv-03972-LHK (PSG) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO FUJITSU LIMITED’S DAUBERT MOTION TO PRECLUDE CERTAIN TESTIMONY OF DR. ARTHUR BRODY Defendants. 26 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO FUJITSU’S DAUBERT MOTION TO PRECLUDE CERTAIN TESTIMONY OF DR. ARTHUR BRODY CASE NO. 10-CV-03972-LHK (PSG) 1 Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 7-1 and 7-12, Plaintiff 2 Fujitsu Limited (“Fujitsu”) and Defendants Belkin International, Inc., Belkin, Inc., D-Link 3 Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., and NETGEAR, Inc., (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby 4 submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order resolving Fujitsu’s October 18, 2012 5 Daubert motion to bar Defendants’ non-infringement expert, Arthur Brody, from opining that 6 Defendants could not have had specific intent to induce infringement (Dkt. No. 317 at 11). 7 On October 22, 2012, Defendants’ filed their Opposition to Fujitsu’s Daubert Motion as 8 to Dr. Brody (Dkt. No. 322 at 16). 9 The parties have met and conferred, and have agreed that the motion be resolved as 10 stated below. 11 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED AND REQUESTED that the Court 12 enter an Order providing that Arthur Brody’s opinion regarding Defendants’ specific intent to 13 induce infringement is excluded, unless Fujitsu opens the door by eliciting opinion testimony 14 as to Defendants’ specific intent to induce infringement. 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 17 DATE: November 5, 2012 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: /s/ Robert D. Fram 1 18 19 Robert D. Fram (rfram@cov.com) Thomas E. Garten (tgarten@cov.com) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5356 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FUJITSU LIMITED 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories hereto. 28 2 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO FUJITSU’S DAUBERT MOTION TO PRECLUDE CERTAIN TESTIMONY OF DR. ARTHUR BRODY CASE NO. 10-CV-03972-LHK (PSG) 1 DATE: November 5, 2012 2 By: /s/ Duncan Palmatier Duncan Palmatier (CA Bar No. 116692) E-mail: dpalm@dpalmlaw.com S.J. Christine Yang (CA Bar No. 102048) E-mail: cyang@sjclawpc.com Victoria Der-Lung Hao (admitted pro hac vice) E-mail: vhao@sjclawpc.com The Law Office of S.J. Christine Yang 17220 Newhope Street, Suites 101 & 102 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Telephone: (714) 641-4022 Facsimile: (714) 641-2082 Attorneys for Defendants D-LINK CORPORATION and D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATE: November 5, 2012 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 11 By: /s/ David Enzminger 12 David Enzminger (CA Bar No. 137065) E-mail: denzminger@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 333 S. Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 615-1780 Facsimile: (213) 615-1750 Attorneys for Defendants BELKIN INTERNATIONAL INC. and BELKIN, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATE: November 5, 2012 REED SMITH LLP By: /s/ William R. Overend William R. Overend (CA Bar No. 180209) E-mail: woverend@reedsmith.com John P. Bovich (CA Bar No. 150688) E-mail: jbovich@reedsmith.com REED SMITH LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105-3659 Telephone: (415) 543-8700 Facsimile: (415) 391-8269 Attorneys for Defendant NETGEAR, INC. 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO FUJITSU’S DAUBERT MOTION TO PRECLUDE CERTAIN TESTIMONY OF DR. ARTHUR BRODY CASE NO. 10-CV-03972-LHK (PSG) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 DATE: 2012 By: ______________________________________ The Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Court Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO FUJITSU’S DAUBERT MOTION TO PRECLUDE CERTAIN TESTIMONY OF DR. ARTHUR BRODY CASE NO. 10-CV-03972-LHK (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?