Fujitsu Limited v. Belkin International, Inc. et al

Filing 619

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 618 Stipulation Re Schedule for Post-Verdict Proceedings.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Robert D. Fram ([e-mail]) (CA Bar No. 126750)
Thomas E. Garten ([e-mail]) (CA Bar No. 247122)
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5356
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Philip A. Irwin ([e-mail]) (admitted pro hac vice)
The New York Times Building
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018-1405
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Gary M. Rubman ([e-mail]) (admitted pro hac vice)
R. Jason Fowler ([e-mail]) (admitted pro hac vice)
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004-2401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Fujitsu Limited

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

[COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
FUJITSU LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
v.
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., BELKIN,
INC., D-LINK CORPORATION, D-LINK
SYSTEMS, INC., NETGEAR, INC., ZYXEL
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, and
ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Defendant.

23
24

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
SCHEDULE FOR POST-VERDICT PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 10-cv-03972-LHK (PSG)

Case No. 10-cv-03972-LHK (PSG)
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR POSTVERDICT PROCEEDINGS

1

Pursuant to Rule 6-2 and 7-12 of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings

2

before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Plaintiff

3

Fujitsu Limited and Defendants Belkin International, Inc., Belkin, Inc., D-Link Corporation,

4

D-Link Systems, Inc., and NETGEAR, Inc., through their respective counsel of record, wish

5

to advise the Court that the parties are negotiating a potential settlement, and accordingly

6

respectfully request and stipulate to an additional three-week extension of the current

7

case post-verdict briefing schedule to allow the parties to finalize terms and prepare the

8

necessary settlement papers.

9

More specifically, with the Court’s permission, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE that

10

the current schedule set forth in the December 19, 2012, Stipulated Order [Dkt. 594] be

11

modified as follows:

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Event
Last day to file and serve
motions under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 50(b) and 59, and
Defendants’ opening briefs
on intervening rights and
laches
Last day for Fujitsu to file
and serve objections to
Defendants’ bills of costs
Last day to file and serve
opposition briefs
Last day to file and serve
reply briefs
Hearing

Current Deadline

Proposed Extension

January 31, 2013

None

February 12, 2013

March 5, 2013

February 22, 2013

March 15, 2013

March 7, 2013

March 28, 2013

April 4, 2013

April 25, 2013 May 16, 2013

The requested modification in the current post-verdict case schedule will not affect

23

any other trial deadlines, as the verdict has already been entered and the case has been

24

marked closed.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
SCHEDULE FOR POST-VERDICT PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 10-cv-03972-LHK (PSG)

1

Respectfully submitted,

1
2

DATE: February 6, 2013

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

3

By: /s/ Robert D. Fram1

4

Robert D. Fram ([e-mail])
Thomas E. Garten ([e-mail])
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5356
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff FUJITSU LIMITED

5
6
7
8
9
10

DATE: February 6, 2013

LAW OFFICE OF S.J. CHRISTINE YANG

11

By: /s/ Duncan Palmatier

12

Duncan Palmatier (CA Bar No. 116692)
E-mail: [e-mail]
S.J. Christine Yang (CA Bar No. 102048)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Victoria Der-Lung Hao (admitted pro hac vice)
E-mail: [e-mail]
The Law Office of S.J. Christine Yang
17220 Newhope Street, Suites 101 & 102
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants D-LINK CORPORATION
and D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of the other signatories hereto.
1

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
SCHEDULE FOR POST-VERDICT PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 10-cv-03972-LHK (PSG)

2

1
2

DATE: February 6, 2013

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

3

By: /s/ David Enzminger

4

David Enzminger (CA Bar No. 137065)
E-mail: [e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants BELKIN
INTERNATIONAL INC. and BELKIN, INC.

5
6
7
8
9
10

DATE: February 6, 2013

REED SMITH LLP

11

By: /s/ John P. Bovich

12

John P. Bovich (CA Bar No. 150688)
E-mail: [e-mail]
William R. Overend (CA Bar No. 180209)
E-mail: [e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant NETGEAR, INC.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

February 7
DATE: _________________, 2013

By: ______________________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
SCHEDULE FOR POST-VERDICT PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 10-cv-03972-LHK (PSG)

3