Esa v. Lockheed Martin Flexible Benefits Plan et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR COMPLIANCE DATE re 39 . Case Management Conference set for 6/10/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/14/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 TAD A. DEVLIN (SBN: 190355) JOEL A. MORGAN (SBN: 262937) GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendant THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 NASSER ESA 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN, LOCKHEED MARTIN GROUP UNIVERSAL LIFE PLAN, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA 18 Defendants. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03977 JF -----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR COMPLIANCE DATE 20 21 TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 The parties in this action, Plaintiff Nasser Esa (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Lockheed 23 Martin Flexible Benefits Plan, Lockheed Martin Group Universal Life Plan, Life Insurance 24 Company of North America, and The Prudential Insurance Company of America (together, 25 “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 26 27 28 WHEREAS the date to complete ADR and the Court’s Case Management Conference was currently set for March 4, 2011; -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR COMPLIANCE DATE CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03977 JF 1 WHEREAS the parties have agreed to mediation with the Court assigned mediator, 2 Michael J. Loeb, but due to scheduling conflicts were not be able to complete mediation by 3 March 4, 2011; 4 WHEREAS the parties have tentatively agreed to conduct mediation on May 31, 2011; 5 WHEREAS the parties respectfully request the Court continue the ADR compliance date 6 to allow the May 31, 2011 mediation to take place within the compliance date, and continue the 7 Case Management Conference until June 10, June 17, or June 24, 2011 as convenient with the 8 Court, to allow the parties to proceed to mediation and then report to the Court on the case status. 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 Respectfully submitted. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: April 5, 2011 THE LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN M. CHABRE 12 13 14 By: /s/ Steven M. Chabre Steven M. Chabre Attorney for Plaintiff NASSER ESA 15 16 _ 17 Dated: April 5, 2011 18 19 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 20 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Dennis Rhodes _ Dennis Rhodes Attorneys for Defendants LOCKHEED MARTIN FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN, LOCKHEED MARTIN GROUP UNIVERSAL LIFE PLAN, AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR COMPLIANCE DATE CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03977 JF 1 Dated: April 5, 2011 2 GORDON & REES LLP 3 4 By: /s/ Tad A. Devlin _ Tad A. Devlin Attorneys for Defendant THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA 5 6 7 8 9 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the ADR compliance date is continued until May 31, 2011 and the Case Management Conference in this case is 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 10 June 10 continued to ___________________, 2011. 12 13 14 15 4/14 Date: ____________________, 2011 _______________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALBI/1066683/9562922v.1 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR COMPLIANCE DATE CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03977 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?