International Business Machines Corporation v. Rambus Inc

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re 6 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/21/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)

Download PDF
International Business Machines Corporation v. Rambus Inc Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Not Yet Admitted ProHac Vice) barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com Naveen Modi (Not Yet Admitted ProHac Vice) naveen.modi@finnegan.com Srikala P. Atluri (Not Yet Admitted ProHac Vice) srikala.atluri@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936) tina.hulse@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Attorneys for Plaintiff Rambus Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. RAMBUS INC., Defendant. CASE NO. CV 10-4017 EMC JW STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. CV 10-4017 EMC Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") and Defendant Rambus Inc. ("Rambus"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate, pursuant to Civ. L.R. 61(a), that Rambus shall have an additional thirty (30) days, to and including October 29, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed September 7, 2010 and served September 8, 2010. By her signature below, counsel for Rambus attests that counsel for IBM concurs in the filing of this document. Dated: September 15, 2010 By: /s/ Tina E. Hulse_________________________ Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936) tina.hulse@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 Telephone:(650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Not Yet Admitted ProHac Vice) barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com Naveen Modi (Not Yet Admitted ProHac Vice) naveen.modi@finnegan.com Srikala P. Atluri (Not Yet Admitted ProHac Vice) srikala.atluri@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone:(202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiff, RAMBUS INC. 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. CV 10-4017 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 15, 2010 By: ___/s/ Edward A. Kmett _______ Edward A. Kmett (SBN: 204374) FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1600 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: (714) 540-8700 Facsimile: (714) 540-9823 Attorney for Defendant, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION IT IS SO ORDERED: September 21 Dated: ____________________, 2010 _____________________________________________ Edward M. Chen James Ware United States Magistrate Judge United States District Judge 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. CV 10-4017 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On September 15, 2010, courtesy copies of the following documents were served by the indicated means to Plaintiff at the address listed: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Anthony M. Zupcic azupcic@fchs.com Robert H. Fischer rfischer@fchs.com Douglas Sharrott dsharrott@fchs.com Kenneth R. Adamo kradamo@jonesday.com Via Email /s/ Tina E. Hulse Tina E. Hulse 4 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. CV 10-4017 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?