Boecker v. Healthways, Inc et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 DISMISSING CASE. Case dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/28/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Cliff Palefsky (SBN 77683) cp@mhpsf.com Scott M. Stillman (SBN 267506) sstillman@mhpsf.com McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 421-9292 Facsimile: (415) 403-0202 Attorneys for Plaintiff DIRK BOECKER
*E-FILED 02-28-2011*
Thomas M. McInerney (SBN 162055) tmm@ogletreedeakins.com Sarah R. Nichols (SBN 233099) sarah.nichols@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 442-4810 Facsimile: (415) 442-4870 Attorneys for Defendants Healthways, Inc., and American Healthways Services, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17 18 19 20 DIRK BOECKER, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HEALTHWAYS, INC., a corporation, AMERICAN HEALTHWAYS SERVICES, INC., a corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. vs. Plaintiff, ) Case No. 5:10-cv-04058 HRL ) ) STIPULATION AND =========== ORDER [PROPOSED] ) FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ========
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1).
Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 24, 2011 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
By: /s/ Thomas M. McInerney Thomas M. McInerney Attorneys For Defendants Healthways, Inc. and American Healthways Services, Inc.
Dated: February 24, 2011
McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY
By: /s/ Cliff Palefsky Cliff Palefsky Attorneys for Plaintiff Dirk Boecker [PROPOSED] =========== ORDER The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). IT IS SO ORDERED.
28 Dated: February ___, 2011 THE HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD United States ======Magistrate Judge District
2
STIPULATION AND =========ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [PROPOSED]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report, and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that the other signatories have concurred in this filing. Dated: February 24, 2011 McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY By: /s/ Scott M. Stillman Scott M. Stillman McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: 415-421-9292 Facsimile: 415-403-0202 Attorneys for Plaintiff
3
STIPULATION AND =========ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [PROPOSED]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?