Dobler & Sons, LLC et al v. California Organics, LLC

Filing 152

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 148 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 146 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Manjar, Inc. ( Responses due by 3/15/2012., Replies due by 4/5/2012.).Associated Cases: 5:10-cv-04092-LHK, 5:11-cv-00529-LHK(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2012)

Case5:10-cv-04092-LHK Document148-3 Filed02/24/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4

Effie F. Anastassiou, Esq. (SBN 96279)
ANASTASSIOU& ASSOCIATES
242 Capitol Street
Post Office Box 2210
Salinas, California 93902
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for OCEANO PACKING COMPANY, LLC

5
6
7
8
9

Marion I. Quesenbery, Esq. (SBN 072308)
RYNN & JANOWSKY, LLP
P.O. Box 20799
Oakland, CA 94620
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, DOBLER & SONS, LLC; SLO COUNTY ORGANICS, LLC;
ASA FARMS, INC.; and BRAGA RANCH, INC.

10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

DOBLER & SONS, LLC; SLO COUNTY
ORGANICS, LLC; ASA FARMS, INC.; and
BRAGA RANCH, INC.

)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
CALIFORNIA ORGANICS, LLC; GEOFF
)
MOUSSEAU; MICHAEL BARNES; DAN
)
FANTZ; CALIFORNIA FARMS, INC.;
)
MANJAR, INC.; CALIFORNIA FARMS
)
INVESTORS, LLC; and AMERICA’S
)
FACTORS, INC.
)
)
Defendants
)
_________________________________________ )
)
AND RELATED ACTION.
)
_________________________________________ )

Case No. 5:10-cv-04092-LHK
Related Case No. 5:11-cv-00529-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME
As Amended by the Court
FRCP 6(b); L.R. 6-3

24

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs OCEANO PACKING COMPANY, LLC

25

(“Oceano”); DOBLER & SONS, LLC; SLO COUNTY ORGANICS, LLC; ASA FARMS, INC.; and

26

BRAGA RANCH, INC. (collectively, the “Dobler Plaintiffs”) Motion to Enlarge Time to oppose Motions

27

for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant MANJAR, INC. (“Manjar”). The Court, having fully

28

considered the papers and pleadings on file and submitted in support of the Motion, and good cause
appearing, and in opposition, and good cause appearing,
Oceano Packing Co., LLC v. California Organics, LLC, et al.
Case Number: 5:11-cv-00529-LHK

[Proposed] Order on Motion to
Enlarge Time to Oppose MSJs

Case5:10-cv-04092-LHK Document148-3 Filed02/24/12 Page2 of 2

1

IT IS ORDERED THAT the deadline for Oceano and the Dobler Plaintiffs to file their oppositions

2

to the Motions for Summary Judgement, which were filed by Manjar on February 16, 2012 in each of the

3

above referenced cases, is hereby extended up to and including March 22, 2012. March 15, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the deadline for Manjar to file its replies to the oppositions
in each of the above referenced cases is hereby extended up to and including April 12, 2012. April 5, 2012
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT no other deadlines in either of the above referenced cases are
altered by this order.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: ____________ ___, 2012
February 29, 2012

________________________________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE,
HONORABLE LUCY M. KOH

11
12
13

F:\OCA\California Organics\Pleadings\Motion for Summary Judgment against OCEANO\Motion to Enlarge Time\Proposed Order.wpd

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Oceano Packing Co., LLC v. California Organics, LLC, et al.
Case Number: 5:11-cv-00529-LHK

[Proposed] Order on Motion to
Enlarge Time to Oppose MSJs