Savage v. MTF Relocation, Inc

Filing 12

ORDER re 8 Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference continued to 1/25/2011, 1:30 PM. All related deadlines adjusted accordingly. Plaintiff will be permitted to appear by phone at the 1/25/2011 case management conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/15/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2010)

Download PDF
Savage v. MTF Relocation, Inc Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JANET L. SAVAGE, v. Plaintiff, No. C10-04216 HRL ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE *E-FILED 11-15-2010* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MTF RELOCATION, INC. dba BEST LOCAL RELOCATION, dba BEST WEEK RELOCATION, dba ADVANCED RELOCATION dba ASAP RELOCATION, dba MTF RELOCATION MOVING AND STORAGE, Defendants. / Because service of the complaint and summons apparently has not yet been effected, the initial case management conference set for November 23, 2010 is continued to January 25, 2011, 1:30 p.m. All related deadlines (see Docket No. 3, Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines) are adjusted accordingly. Plaintiff will be permitted to appear telephonically at the January 25, 2011 case management conference. She shall make necessary arrangements to have CourtCall (866-5826878) initiate the call to the court just prior to the time set for the conference. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 15, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5:10-cv-04216-HRL Notice mailed to: Janet L. Savage P.O. Box 524 Lawton, OK 73502-0524 Pro Se Plaintiff United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?