Genentech, Inc v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

Filing 58

ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND DENYING PENDING 29 MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on September 30, 2011. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 GENENTECH, INC., 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 5:10-CV-04255 EJD ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND DENYING PENDING MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Re: Docket No. 29) On December 1, 2010, Judge Fogel ordered that this action would be stayed pending a 18 decision in the District of Delaware on Plaintiff Genentech, Inc.’s (“Genentech”) motion to 19 transfer. On April 25, 2011, this action was transferred to the undersigned. On August 23, 2011, 20 the court ordered the parties to file a Joint Status Statement. On September 2, 2011, the parties filed 21 a Joint Case Management Conference Statement. Having considered the statement, 22 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay is continued pending a decision in the District of Delaware on Genentech’s motion to transfer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the case is stayed and the court must maintain its docket, Genentech’s pending motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to the 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:10-CV-04255 EJD ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND DENYING PENDING MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 5 motion being renewed when the stay is removed. Dated: _________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 5:10-CV-04255 EJD ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND DENYING PENDING MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?