Genentech, Inc v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Filing
58
ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND DENYING PENDING 29 MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on September 30, 2011. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
GENENTECH, INC.,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC,
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 5:10-CV-04255 EJD
ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND
DENYING PENDING MOTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(Re: Docket No. 29)
On December 1, 2010, Judge Fogel ordered that this action would be stayed pending a
18
decision in the District of Delaware on Plaintiff Genentech, Inc.’s (“Genentech”) motion to
19
transfer. On April 25, 2011, this action was transferred to the undersigned. On August 23, 2011,
20
the court ordered the parties to file a Joint Status Statement. On September 2, 2011, the parties filed
21
a Joint Case Management Conference Statement. Having considered the statement,
22
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay is continued pending a decision in the District of
Delaware on Genentech’s motion to transfer.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the case is stayed and the court must maintain its
docket, Genentech’s pending motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to the
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:10-CV-04255 EJD
ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND DENYING PENDING MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
2
3
4
5
motion being renewed when the stay is removed.
Dated:
_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:10-CV-04255 EJD
ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND DENYING PENDING MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?